My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8F Consent 2013 1007
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
Packet 2013 1007
>
8F Consent 2013 1007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2013 9:41:17 AM
Creation date
10/2/2013 2:41:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
10/7/2013
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2013 1007 RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2013\Packet 2013 1007
Reso 2013-126
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />Facility Audit Report 13 <br />San Leandro WWTF <br />is recommended, as it will maintain an almost constant airflow even if the discharge pressure <br />fluctuates, and will require minimal capital cost. A high efficiency blower will not produce <br />significant savings, and few are available at this size. The estimated power demand is 3.6 KW, <br />or 31,900 kWh annually. <br />Table 3.2.1.1.1 – Energy Usage Summary for Process Air Retrofit Options <br /> <br /> <br />The majority of energy cost savings result from reducing energy (kWh) charges, not demand <br />(KW) charges. However, we do anticipate a minor reduction in peak demand charges for the <br />recommended retrofit, as reflected in Table 3.2.1.1. At the highest baseline process airflows, <br />process air continued to be vented to the offline basin to supply its diffusers, adding to the total <br />blower airflow, and peak power demand. This airflow will be supplied much more efficiently at <br />low pressure if the low pressure blower recommendation is followed. The baseline maximum <br />demand from the blower system was estimated at 169 KW, averaged over the year. The <br />corresponding post retrofit demand estimate is 159 KW, the result of the 400 SCFM reduction in <br />peak airflow for the main blowers, less the added demand of the proposed low pressure PD <br />blower. <br />3.2.1.2 Scope of Effort to Improve Performance <br />A single high efficiency turbo blower was determined to be the most cost effective EEM for the <br />process air supply. One of the existing Lamson multistage blowers would be replaced by a high <br />efficiency blower capable of operation below 3000 SCFM. The new blower is expected to use <br />the existing Lamson power supply with minimal modifications. Its controls will have to be <br />integrated with the remaining Lamson blowers, allowing the turbo blower to operate at the <br />lowest airflow demands, then using the Lamsons exclusively above the capacity of the turbo <br />blower. For the occasional flow demands below the minimum of the turbo blower, excess air <br />will need to be vented. <br />The low pressure air supply to the offline basin will require new piping to intercept the two <br />existing basin air supply manifolds. Figure 3.2.1.2.1 shows the overall air supply schematic. <br />The low pressure supply lines from the PD blower are expected to be 3” diameter, and could be <br />tapped into the existing basin supply lines below the control and isolation valves. Manual valves <br />would be included on each low pressure supply branch to direct the low pressure airflow to the <br />offline basin. <br /> <br />ABS1 - 93 HP, 1 - 200 HP 524,000 <br />APG Neuros1 - 100 HP 536,000 <br />Universal EE-PAC2 - 60 HP 539,000 <br />Blower MakeBlower Rated HP <br />Annual <br />Process Air <br />Energy, <br />KWh
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.