Laserfiche WebLink
SAN LEANDRO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE TITLE 2 CITY MANAGER <br /> tion and the general nature of the evidence then known by the City Manager. Notwithstand- <br /> ing the foregoing, the nature and extent of evidence which may be presented by the City <br /> Manager in any subsequent Enforcement Hearing pursuant to §2.3.125(d) below shall not <br /> be limited or abridged by reason of the presentment or non-presentment or recitation or non- <br /> recitation of such evidence in the course of the informal resolution efforts. <br /> (b) Council Preference for Cure. To the extent reasonably consistent with the goal of obtain- <br /> ing compliance with the Regulations, it shall be the policy of the City Council to notify the <br /> Company of a possible or alleged violation and, if said violation is then curable, allow a <br /> reasonable time for the Company to cure the possible or alleged violation. If the Company <br /> does so cure, in the absence of aggravating circumstances, it shall be the preference of the <br /> City Council to abstain from further enforcement action. <br /> (c) Determination of Probable Cause for Enforcement Hearing. In the event that the infor- <br /> mal efforts at resolution are ineffective or otherwise inappropriate: <br /> (1) The City Manager may notice the Company to meet with the City Manager on not <br /> less than ten (10) days notice to determine whether or not probable cause exists to <br /> believe that the Company has failed, neglected or refused to comply with the provi- <br /> sions of these Regulations; or <br /> (2) In the sole discretion of the City Manager, the City Manager may notice the Com- <br /> pany to meet with the Council on not less than ten (10) days notice to determine <br /> whether or not probable cause exists to believe that the Company has failed, ne- <br /> glected or refused to comply with the provisions of these Regulations. <br /> In either event, the probable cause determination shall be initiated by the City Man- <br /> ager's general statement of the alleged violations under investigation and the general <br /> nature of the evidence then known to the City Manager and/or the Council. Notwith- <br /> standing the foregoing, the nature and extent of evidence which may be presented by <br /> the City Manager in any subsequent Enforcement Hearing pursuant to §2.3.125(d) <br /> below shall not be limited or abridged by reason of the presentment or non- <br /> presentment or recitation or non-recitation of such evidence in the course of the <br /> probable cause determination. <br /> (d) Enforcement Hearings. Upon a determination of the City Manager or the Council pursuant <br /> to §2.3.125(a) above, the probable cause exists to believe that the Company has failed, ne- <br /> glected or refused to comply with the provisions of these Regulations, the City Council may <br /> hold such hearings, conduct such procedures and impose such remedies as are authorized by <br /> these Regulations. <br /> (e) Conduct of Enforcement Hearings. The hearing may be conducted either by the City <br /> Council or, at the sole discretion of the City Council, by a hearing officer appointed by the <br /> City Manager to conduct the hearing. <br /> Department Responsible for Revision: City Manager Chapter 2.3 <br /> 11/20/2006 Page 3 <br />