Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - January 11 , 1993 Page - 11 - <br /> NEW BUSINESS (continued) <br /> George Piperis, 325 Beverly Avenue, President of the North Area <br /> Business Association, said his organization is opposed to Dunsmuir <br /> Heights. He said there will be a heavy impact on local streets. He <br /> said the North Area Program emphasized that a successful business <br /> district must be attractive, be a destination, and meet community <br /> needs. He said it is ironic that, as renewed interest in the North <br /> Area begins, the Council is weighing the possibility of adding this <br /> burden to the streets. He said the decision tonight is a linchpin to <br /> Dunsmuir Heights. He asked the Council not to undermine long-term <br /> business for short-term costs and not to let outsiders control them. <br /> Mark Behning, 725 Joaquin Avenue, said he was at the meeting because <br /> Dave Karp took it upon himself to make a deal . He said, in September <br /> the residents of San Leandro came to the Council to voice opposition to <br /> Dunsmuir Heights. He said San Leandro had no choice but to file an <br /> Appeal . He said he does not remember any Council Member instructing <br /> Mayor Karp to meet with the developer. He said $500,000 amounts to <br /> about $100 for every household affected by traffic from the project. <br /> He said the money does not take care of problems and only attempts to <br /> mitigate a few of the items listed in the City's Appeal . He said this <br /> does not justify the City withdrawing the Appeal and not suing. He <br /> said the quality of life is not for sale. He said the City Council <br /> cannot vote to withdraw the Appeal when the MOU does not mitigate all <br /> the problems. <br /> John Bailey, 495 Fortuna Avenue, said $500,000 accounts for only 30% of <br /> the total cost of improvements. He said this results in an $800,000 <br /> loss which won't be gained in sales-tax revenue. He said the <br /> development would have to generate $80 million over 20 years to make up <br /> the difference. He said taking the money will mean we are forced to <br /> get the other $800,000 somewhere else, and it will come from the <br /> Council 's constituents. He said he feels a lawsuit would be better <br /> than this. <br /> Beverly Merrick, 3058 Revere Avenue, Oakland, said she is suspicious of <br /> the Council ' s willingness to give up the community's rights and of a <br /> developer who is suddenly willing to deal . She said the dollar amount <br /> is not sufficient to make up for the loss of quality of life, the <br /> safety of children, and the view from Lake Chabot. She asked the <br /> Council to support the community, not stab them in the back. <br /> David Brooks, 3420 Rubin Drive, Oakland, said he lives in Oakland <br /> because he lost his home and neighborhood in the Oakland fire in <br /> October 1991 . He said Oakland is not prepared to fight such fires, and <br /> he does not want to see this happen again in this development. He said <br /> Oakland cannot take on a project such as this and asked the City <br /> Council not to send the wrong message. <br />