Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - June 7, 1993 Page - 12 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> Vice Mayor Polvorosa asked for the City Council and the audience to <br /> take a moment to recognize the individuals who had been nominated <br /> earlier to serve on the City's Boards and Commissions. <br /> B. Matter of Utility User Tax. <br /> This being the time and place for the Public Hearing on the above <br /> matter, John Jermanis, Finance Director, said the Public Hearing was on <br /> one element of the Budget Strategies for 1993-94. He said the budget <br /> does not include raising the Utility Tax. He said, if the Ordinance <br /> was passed, it would be a contingency measure, only to be used if the <br /> State takes $1 .5 million. He said the budget provides for $1.2 million <br /> in reductions. He said the Task Force recommended that the Utility Tax <br /> was one that could be raised for funds to continue existing services. <br /> He said the budget can be balanced without this, provided the State <br /> reduction is not more than $1 .2 million. <br /> Mr. Jermanis reviewed some of the actions the State Legislature is <br /> considering and how they would affect San Leandro, if enacted. He said <br /> the budget includes $1 .8 million in reductions. He said the State <br /> could take from $1 .2 to $2.5 million. He said $2.5 million represents <br /> most of the AB 8 monies. He said San Leandro lost $1 million last <br /> year, and the remaining AB 8 shift equals $2.5 million. He said the <br /> Legislature initially planned to take this money over a three-year <br /> period, but it may now be necessary for them to take a greater amount <br /> earlier. He said the Governor has set a new level of $288 million, <br /> applied to cities only. This would be $800,000 for San Leandro. He <br /> said the Legislature is looking at alternatives, such as motor vehicle <br /> fees, which would mean an $850,000 loss. He said a sales tax shift <br /> would mean a $1 .640 million loss because San Leandro has a high per <br /> capita sales tax. He said these alternates are being proposed by <br /> cities that find them more advantageous, such as Los Angeles. He said <br /> many scenarios are possible, and the City needs to maintain this <br /> contingency plan. <br /> If the State adopts its budget with greater than $1 .5 million in cuts <br /> for San Leandro, the utility tax increase would be implemented. He <br /> said it would also be implemented if Sales Tax for the City drops by <br /> more than $1 million. <br /> He said, if the utility tax is not approved, the City would have to <br /> utilize reserves or go back to other alternatives, such as cuts in <br /> services recommended by the Task Force. He said these include <br /> reduction of Fire Department apparatus-replacement reserves, closing <br /> two branch libraries, eliminating sworn police officers, turning off <br /> certain street lights, closing swimming pools, and abandoning after- <br /> school recreation programs. He said these reductions were felt to be <br /> too severe but would raise $1 million. He said the increase in the <br /> utility tax will save these programs. <br />