My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes 1992 0406
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1992
>
Minutes 1992 0406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2014 4:57:40 PM
Creation date
1/14/2014 4:57:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minutes
Document Date (6)
4/6/1992
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - April 6, 1992 Page - 17 - <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) <br /> Council Member Santos noted there had been numerous tests over the <br /> years and asked what was the potential for contamination based upon <br /> past testing. Mr. McManus said it was difficult to conclude ahead of <br /> time what the outcome would be; but he said, based on review of data to <br /> date, only a small amount of tarry material around the old oil tank <br /> area had been found and had been cleared up. He said the rest of the <br /> data indicates that typical clean-up mitigation and remediation can be <br /> done. <br /> Council Member Santos noted that no Federal or State agencies had <br /> issued any citations, etc. , on the site. Mr. McManus said that was <br /> true and that the matter had only been reopened because regulations <br /> have changed over the years. <br /> Council Member Glaze asked how they decided where to do sampling. Mr. <br /> McManus said they focused on the areas with the highest possibility of <br /> finding contamination, particularly in the area of the Trojan Powder <br /> Company activities, as well as areas that were not tested before and <br /> areas that were distributed according to an aerial photograph <br /> throughout the site. He said testing would be on-going up until <br /> groundbreaking but that all information needed for investigation will <br /> be known. He described the various phases, such as soil tests, water <br /> samples, etc. He said the PEA would identify impacts and determine <br /> mitigation and remediation, and this would become part of the project <br /> activities. <br /> In response to a question from the City Council , he said fill brought <br /> to the site will only be tested if it is suspected to contain <br /> contaminants. <br /> Council Member Perry asked how they knew what was in the groundwater <br /> and if it was normal for a PEA not to be done at this time. Mr. <br /> McManus said they would be installing groundwater monitoring wells and <br /> conducting surface testing depending upon the results of the <br /> investigation. He said it is typical that the PEA is not completed <br /> this early in the entitlement process, and the Department of Toxic <br /> Substances prefers that it not be done too early because the situation <br /> and site could change. Mr. McManus said the PEA should be completed <br /> prior to approval of the Precise Development Plan. <br /> Mayor Karp noted that the developer cannot even build until the State <br /> declares that the site is clean. <br /> Council Member Santos asked if groundwater contamination transcends <br /> borders and if there had been any evidence that groundwater in the <br /> surrounding area had been contaminated. Mr. McManus said no, there was <br /> no evidence that the underlying native soils or bay mud, which is <br /> fairly impermeable, have been contaminated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.