Minutes 1990 0220 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Minutes - San Leandro City Council Meeting - FEBRUARY 20, 1990 Page - 11 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) further documentation. She also noted that Mr. Saberi 's representative said Mr. Saberi had been kidnapped so that he was not able to provide the information. She recommended denial of the Appeal and said Mr. Saberi would then have to cease all activity and be required to get a new Conditional Use Permit. She said he now has no Business License and no Underground Tank Permit for this location. The Hearing was then opened to the public. Tom Saberi , the son of the property owner, Mr. Andy Saberi , 1045 Airport Boulevard, South San Francisco, said they had submitted all of the evidence they had available to submit and no further documentation was available. The City Council asked questions regarding State Board of Equalization Reports and utility bills. There being no further comments from the public, on motion of Council Member Santos, seconded by Council Member Suchman and carried unanimously, the Public Hearing was closed. On motion of Council Member Jardin, seconded by Council Member Glaze and carried unanimously, the Board of Zoning Adjustments recommendation was upheld and the Appeal was denied. d. Matter of Assessment District No. 94, 139th Avenue. Continued from City Council Meeting of January 2, 1990. This being the time and place for the Public Hearing on the above matter, Bill Silva, City Engineer, said the matters before the City Council were continued Hearings on this Assessment District that would result in three basic actions, including the matter of the Hearings, confirming the assessments, and authorizing the acquisition of property. He noted Mr. Zenklusen's protest had been withdrawn, with the understanding that 139th Avenue would be posted for no parking. The Hearing was then opened to the public. Mrs. Vitale reinforced her protest to the method of allocation of costs and said she felt it should be based upon the square footage of the properties involved. There being no further comments from the public, on motion of Council Member Santos, seconded by Council Member Jardin and carried unanimously, the Public Hearing on Whether the Public Convenience and Necessity Require the Ordering of Proposed Improvements Without First Complying with the Provisions of the Special Assessment Investigation Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 ; the Hearing of Protests Relative to Resolution of Intention No. 88-127, Resolution of Intention to Order Certain Public Improvements; and the Hearings Regarding Proposed Changes in Work to Be Done; were closed.