Laserfiche WebLink
Potentially <br /> Significant • <br /> Potentially Unless Less than <br /> • Significant Mitigation Significant <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact <br /> XV. RECREATION. • <br /> a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional X <br /> parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical <br /> deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? <br /> b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or X <br /> expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical • • <br /> effect on the environment? <br /> Comments: <br /> a-b: The project will not create significant impacts on existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, <br /> nor will it require construction or expansion of facilities that could have an adverse physical effect on the environment. • <br /> The project will create employment adjacent to the Downtown San Leandro BART Station and the site plan will include <br /> on-site recreational amenities for the employees including outdoor plazas,physical activity areas and landscaped green <br /> space. These facilities will be adequate to accommodate the recreational needs of the new businesses and employees. <br /> XVI. TRANSPORTATIOWTRAFFIC. Would the project: <br /> a. Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing <br /> traffic load and capacity of the street system(i.e.,result in a substantial X <br /> increase in either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to capacity ratio • <br /> on roads,or congestion at intersections)? <br /> b. Exceed,either individually or cumulatively,a level of service standard <br /> established in the Growth Limitation Plan,the county congestion X <br /> management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including either an increase in X <br /> traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? <br /> d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature(e.g.,sharp curves X <br /> or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g., farm equipment)? <br /> (3,25) <br /> e. Result in inadequate emergency access? X <br /> f. Result in inadequate parking capacity? X <br /> . g. Conflict with adopted policies,plans,or programs supporting alternative X <br /> transportation(e.g., bus turnouts,bicycle racks)? <br /> h. Trigger CMA Review(More that 100 PM Peak Hour Trips generated over • X <br /> existing General Plan) <br /> • <br /> 23 <br />