My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8B Consent 2014 0421
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
Packet 2014 0421
>
8B Consent 2014 0421
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2014 3:58:18 PM
Creation date
4/17/2014 6:06:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
4/21/2014
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2014 0421 CSAmended+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0421
Ord 2014-002
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> 13 <br /> <br /> <br />2.5.1. Scope of Review of Subsequent Approvals. By approving the Project <br />Approvals, City has made a final policy decision that the Project is in the best interests of the <br />public health, safety and general welfare. Accordingly, Cit y shall not use its authority in <br />considering any application for a discretionary Subsequent Approval to change the policy <br />decisions reflected by the Project Approvals or otherwise to prevent or delay development of the <br />Project as set forth in the Project Approvals. Instead, the Subsequent Approvals shall be deemed <br />to be tools to implement those final policy decisions. The scope of the review of applications for <br />Subsequent Approvals shall be limited to a review of substantial conformity with the Vested <br />Elements and the Applicable Rules (except as otherwise provided by Section 2.4), and <br />compliance with CEQA. Where such substantial conformity/compliance exists, City shall not <br />deny an application for a Subsequent Approval for the Project. <br />2.6. Development Fees, Exactions; and Conditions.General. All fees, exactions, <br />dedications, reservations or other impositions to which the Project would be subject, but for this <br />Development Agreement, are referred to in this Development Agreement either as “Processing <br />Fees,” (as defined in Section 2.6.2) or “Impact Fees” (as defined in Section 2.6.3). <br />2.6.2. Processing Fees. “Processing Fees” mean fees charged on a citywide <br />basis to cover the cost of City review of applications for any permit or other review by City <br />departments. Applications for Subsequent Approvals for the Project shall be charged Processing <br />Fees to allow City to recover its actual and reasonable costs of processing Developer’s <br />Subsequent Approvals with respect to the Project. <br />2.6.3. Impact Fees. “Impact Fees” means monetary fees, exactions or <br />impositions, other than taxes or assessments, whether established for or imposed upon the <br />Project individually or as part of a class of projects, that are imposed by City on the Project in <br />connection with any Project Approval for the Project for any purpose, including, without <br />limitation, defraying all or a portion of the cost of public services and/or facilities construction, <br />improvement, operation and maintenance attributable to the burden created by the Project. Any <br />fee, exaction or imposition imposed on the Project which is not a Processing Fee is an Impact <br />Fee. No Impact Fees shall be applicable to the Project except as provided in this Development <br />Agreement. <br />a. Only the specific Impact Fees listed in Exhibit E shall apply to the <br />Project. The amount of any Impact Fees applicable to the Project shall be calculated based on <br />the rate in effect at the time that each application for a building permit is submitted and payable <br />upon the City’s issuance of a certificate of occupancy. <br />b. Any Impact Fees levied against or applied to the Project must be <br />consistent with the provisions of applicable California law, including the provisions of <br />Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (“AB 1600”). Developer retains all rights set forth in <br />California Government Code Section 66020. Nothing in this Development Agreement shall <br />diminish or eliminate any of Developer’s rights set forth in such section. <br />2.6.4. Conditions of Subsequent Approvals.In connection with any Subsequent Approvals, City <br />shall have the right to impose reasonable conditions including, without limitation, normal and <br />customary dedications for rights of way or easements for public access, utilities, water, sewers,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.