Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit D: Excerpt of the Board of Zoning Adjustments Regular Meeting Minutes, April 3, 2014 Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br />to the C-RM District. She also pointed out that the new uses fall into three groups: 1) some to be <br />permitted outright; 2) some that may be permitted by the ZEO after Administrative Review; and 3) those <br />subject to a BZA-approved CUP. She said the purpose of the additions is to give Bayfair the flexibility of <br />bringing new uses to the Center. <br />In response to a follow-up question from Member Daly, Planner Barros said that the C-RM District <br />corresponds exactly with the Bayfair Center and the King Family Trust’s 3.7 acres, which is used for <br />parking. The nearby Fairmont Square Shopping Center (location of Lucky’s) and Fashion Faire Plaza <br />(location of the new BevMo!) are both zoned CC(PD). <br />Retail Services: Addressing the issue of tattoo studios, Member Houston said she opposes the idea of <br />confining tattoos to cosmetic services (e.g., permanent makeup). <br />After some discussion, members agreed that Retail Services should be defined as: <br />Provision of recurrently needed services of a personal nature. This classification includes barber and <br />beauty shops, tattoo studios, seamstresses, tailors, shoe repair shops, dry cleaning businesses <br />(excluding large-scale plants), photocopying and self-service laundries. Tattoo studios are <br />establishments principally engaged in the business of creating indelible marks or figures fixed upon <br />the body by insertion of pigment under the skin or by production of scars for pay. Retail Services <br />excludes coin-operated self-service laundries and coin-operated dry cleaning businesses. <br />Tattoo Studios wouldn’t require CUPs, but be permitted outright along with other Retail Services except <br />in the SA-2 District due to the proximity to McKinley Elementary School). <br />When Member Houston asked how body piercings are addressed, Planner Barros said the City’s code is <br />silent on that, basically relying on state regulations applicable to those with cosmetology licenses. <br />Chair Mendieta asked whether someone working in a hair salon who has an appropriate license would <br />be able to perform permanent makeup tattooing services. Planner Barros said yes, as long as it’s explicit <br />in the facility’s business license as well, both artistic and cosmetic tattooing would be permissible. <br />Mobile Food Vending: Acknowledging that trailers aren’t necessarily motorized, Vice Chair Palma <br />asked whether pushcarts are included in the definition. Member Thomas noted that especially during <br />baseball season, ice cream vendors come by with pushcarts, which is a valuable service for teams and <br />their parents. In response, Planner Barros said she’d follow up to make the definition clear in regard to <br />pushcarts, and emphasized that the intent was to be more flexible, not more restrictive. In fact, she <br />explained that the Mobile Food Vending ordinance covers what is allowed in the public ROW, but staff <br />was seeking a definition applicable to private property and supportive of an Administrative Review <br />process for approving events that include Mobile Food Vending in more districts throughout the City <br />(e.g., industrial areas and Bayfair Center). She also made it clear that pushcarts would still be allowed in <br />the ROW. <br />Massage Therapy: Chair Mendieta said we need to do everything possible to stem or stop human <br />trafficking and prostitution. Member Hudson agreed, pointing out that there’s quite a problem in the <br />North Area, and it’s not being handled well. She said these facilities are not ready to be either self- <br />regulated or state-regulated, but need city oversight. <br />Community Gardens: Member Hudson questioned part of Article 16.4-1690. She noted that B.2 reads, <br />“If the Community Garden is enclosed by fencing, the fencing must be . . . covered by plant material or <br />other vegetative screening within three years . . . ” She asked whether that means it must be covered with <br />vegetation within three years’ time. Planner Barros said yes, that’s a typical requirement designed to <br />“soften” a fence. Member Hudson also asked about the height of the fencing. Planner Barros said in the <br />front or side yard, it could be no more than three feet in height; outside of the required setbacks, fences <br />could reach up to seven feet in residential districts and eight feet for commercial and industrial zones.