My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
4A Public Hearing 2014 0602
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
Packet 2014 0602
>
4A Public Hearing 2014 0602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2014 1:08:09 PM
Creation date
5/28/2014 11:30:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
6/2/2014
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2014 0602 RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0602
PowerPoint 4A Public Hearing 2014 0602 Zoning Code Amendments
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0602
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
definition be expanded to Senior and Mixed Use Development Parking, at the minimum. BZA <br />Member Daly, noting that the Downtown Transit Oriented District (TOD) Strategy already <br />addressed minimized parking requirements for higher-density development downtown, warned <br />against creating parking nightmares. Commissioner Fitzsimons agreed that senior facilities may <br />have lower parking needs, but he also cautioned against too much relaxation of parking standards <br />because cars are not going away unless the City receives benefits in return. <br />Paving in Front Yards: Vice Chair Palma asked whether paving in front yards, which was <br />included under the “Parking” umbrella in the staff report, should specify use of pervious <br />materials. Although it’s more expensive, she said, it’s much better for the environment. Planner <br />Barros said this would be a great thing to examine more closely in the future, but that this <br />proposal is to clarify the existing policy to limit impervious paving to fifty percent of a front yard. <br />In response to Member Daly’s asking whether something like a red lava rock yard would be <br />considered paving, Planner Barros said that red lava rock would be “pervious,” and staff also is <br />proposing adding the definition of pervious to the Zoning Code (Article 30). <br />Recycling Facilities: In response to Commissioner Fitzsimons question about how the recycling <br />center on the Safeway parking lot on Bancroft Avenue is categorized, Planner Barros said it <br />would fit in the “small collection” category (Article 16, Section 1646-B). She said as she <br />understands state law, recycling facilities are required within a certain radius of grocery stores. <br />Signs: In response to Chair Mendieta, Secretary Barros said the Municipal Code covers the issue <br />of awning maintenance. Although no language change was proposed in the Zoning Code text <br />about temporary political signs, Commissioner Rennie said he believes it needs to be updated to <br />align with current law. <br />Tattoo Parlors: Although Planner Barros indicated that this definition would be removed and <br />“tattoo studios” added to Retail Services, there was a question whether tattoo artists require <br />licenses or certification, along the lines of the California Massage Therapy Council (CAMTC). <br />Wireless Telecommunications Facilities: Commissioner Fitzsimons raised several issues: <br />• Who in the City would be the one to determine an acceptable neutral paint color for <br />freestanding towers and ground-mounted facilities if they don’t have a galvanized steel <br />finish? The Zoning Enforcement Official, according to Planner Barros. <br />• The proposal includes a requirement that any exterior lighting must be manually <br />operated; he would like freestanding wireless facilities able to use time-clock controls for <br />any lighting that is allowed. <br />• Could the table summarizing the individual zoning district process for reviewing <br />telecommunication facility applications be included in the matrix? Planner Barros said it <br />would be in the matrix as well as in the Zoning Code. <br />Chair Mendieta expressed concern that the City does not require a certain distance between a <br />wireless telecommunications facility and elementary schools. Planner Barros said staff would <br />ensure that the City’s regulations align with federal regulations. <br />Article 21: Planner Barros said staff is proposing placing conditions of approval on the <br />development application for Administrative Review. Further, staff proposes adding a paragraph <br />stating that notices may be mailed to owners of adjacent properties when the ZEO determines that <br />granting a permit via Administrative Review could generate significant public concerns. At this <br />time, she added that the Administrative Review process requires no public outreach. <br />In regard to Section 5-2106 Effective Date; Lapse of Permit; Appeals, Commissioner <br />Fitzsimons noted that the language addresses applicant appeals, but has no indication of the <br />Exhibit E: Excerpt of Meeting Minutes for Planning Commission/BZA Joint Work Session, January 30 <br /> Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.