My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2014-041
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2014
>
Reso 2014-041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2014 3:16:18 PM
Creation date
5/28/2014 3:16:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
5/19/2014
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
8E Consent 2014 0519
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0519
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 10 of 13 <br /> San Leandro Housing Element Implementation Program -2013 Annual Progress Report-Table C <br /> Name of Goal/Program Objectives/Summary of Actions Tmmeframe Status of Program Implementation <br /> in H.E. <br /> The City is also working on improving policies and procedures to assist non-English <br /> speakers under a HUD-approved Language Access Plan(LAP).The City's LAP,created in <br /> October 2010,discusses various oral and written language access measures. <br /> The City provides housing-related brochures in English/Spanish/Chinese for the First <br /> Time Homebuyer Program, Housing Rehabilitation Program, and Rent Review Program, <br /> There is also foreclosure information in English/Spanish on the City's website. ECHO <br /> Housing,to whom the City outsources its fair housing services to, provides bilingual staff <br /> assistance, an English/Spanish newsletter and creates an English/Spanish fair housing <br /> flyer sent to all City landlords annually.During its annual"Fair Housing Month"activities in <br /> April,the City provides an English/Spanish/Chinese fair housing flyer on its website and at <br /> _City Hall and the main library. <br /> Public Service Employees <br /> Action 58.12-A:Housing for Explore programs which assist teachers, nurses, police officers, and other community Ongoing ADVANCE: No action to date. However, the future of affordable housing funding is <br /> Public Service Employees service employees in obtaining suitable and affordable housing within the community. problematic with the continued reductions in both federal and state funding as well as with <br /> Explore state funding possibilities.To the extent permitted by law, consider directing a the elimination of the City's Redevelopment Agency. <br /> _percentage of redevelopment set-aside funds for this purpose. <br /> Goal 59: Reduce potential constraints that increase the cost or feasibility of new housing See each <br /> Elimination of Housing development. timeframe <br /> Constraints below <br /> Zoning Regulations <br /> Action 59.01-A:Amend the Maintain provisions in the Zoning Code for"Planned Developments"(PDs)on sites where 2010-2011 ADVANCE:Ongoing implementation of Article 10 Planned Developments which allows for <br /> Minimum Lot Area Required the strict application of zoning standards could make development less feasible.The PD stated flexibility in requirements in exchange for harmonious development and mitigations <br /> for a Planned Development designation should allow flexibility with setback requirements, minimum lot sizes, lot for impacts. <br /> coverage limits, and other standards to reflect the unique context of each site. The <br /> designation should not preclude the requirement that development is harmonious with the <br /> surrounding neighborhood and that impacts on local services and the environment are <br /> mitigated. <br /> To facilitate PD, the City should lower the required minimum lot size for PDs in the RM ADVANCE:No action to date. Zoning Code amendment(s)would require Council action. <br /> zone from 10,000 SF to 6,000 SF. This could enable additional 3-5 unit buildings on Upcoming comprehensive Zoning Code amendments in 2014 will propose a reduced <br /> several underutilized lots in the RM districts. required minimum lot size for PDs to 6,000 SF. <br /> Action 59.01-B:Amend Amend the Zoning Code to facilitate the production of multi-family housing: 2010-2011 ADVANCE: No action to date.Zoning Code amendment(s)would require Council action. <br /> Zoning Code Provisions for a) Adopt a minimum density requirement of 12 units per acre for new development on Upcoming comprehensive Zoning Code amendments in 2014 will propose stated multi- <br /> Multi-Family Uses properties zoned RM-1800,RM-2000,and RM-2500. family density and regulation changes. <br /> b) Amend Section 2-696(A)(Article 6)to note that housing in CC and CRM is subject to <br /> RM-1800 regulations(24 units per acre)rather than RM-2000 zone(22 units per acre). <br /> c) Amend Section 2-684 and 2-686 to allow higher FARs and lot coverage limits in the CC <br /> and CN zone when residential uses are included in a development project. <br /> Action 59.01-C:Amendments Consider amending the second unit provisions to allow units ranging from 450 to 700 2010-2011 ACHIEVED:City Council approved Zoning Code amendments in 2012 to the second unit <br /> to the Second Unit Standards square feet with a conditional use permit. Retain the requirement that the unit may not ordinance to increase maximum size from 450 SF to a maximum range of 450-750 SF <br /> exceed 30%of the total floor area.Consider this as a way to increase the supply of one- depending on lot size. <br /> bedroom in-law units. <br /> Action 59.01-D:Changes to Amend the NA-1 and NA-2 zones(parcels fronting E.14th St.between San Leandro Creek 2010-2011 ADVANCE: No action to date.Zoning Code amendment(s)would require Council action. <br /> the North Area(NA)Zoning and Durant Ave.)to align with best practices for transit-oriented corridors. Development <br /> Districts intensities should be comparable to the SA zone(parcels fronting E 14th St.between Sybil <br /> Ave.and Bayfair Mall).Consider these changes: <br /> a) Raising the maximum density in NA-1 and NA-2 from 24 to 40 units per acre, or <br /> dropping the maximum entirely to let the existing 1.5 FAR gov-ern future development <br /> intensity.Overall densities should be comparable to SA zones,where a 1.5 FAR and no <br /> maximum density applies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.