My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
4A Public Hearing 2014 0902
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
Packet 2014 0902
>
4A Public Hearing 2014 0902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2019 8:36:39 AM
Creation date
8/26/2014 3:29:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
9/2/2014
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2014 0902 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0902
Reso 2014-090
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
From: Kevin Zhang <kezhuang.berkeley@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:26 AM <br />To: Penaranda, Elmer <br />Subject: Heron Bay Residential Neighborhood Gate - Strongly Disagree - Should Not Approve! <br />Hi Elmer, <br />I am a resident in the Heron Bay. A couple weeks ago, I sent out an email expressing my discontent with the gate <br />installation project in Heron Bay. <br />Recently, I spoke with my neighbors and would like to share some further comments regarding the gate installation. <br />The bottom line is that we all think that the gate installation is unnecessary, costly, and incompatible with the overall <br />environment in Heron Bay. The installation project is proposed by a gate and fencing company, not directly by our <br />Heron Bay residents. There is a conflict of interest, because the party that's proposing the change is incentivized by <br />making money, rather than purely protecting the residents, whom we think are the ultimate the victims of the gate and <br />fencing company. <br />This is not to say that we are willing to sacrifice our safety for cost. If the gate is truely effective, we will consider <br />installing it, but the reality says otherwise. There will be no one who's maintaining the gate. If no one is actually <br />controlling, then any car could open and pass the gate relatively easily anyway. So the gate really provides <br />no value. We just do not think the gate can help us in any way. <br />Moreover, the gate will deface our natural environment in Heron Bay. We are proud of how environmental and natural <br />friendly Heron Bay is - the bay is lying right behind us and the trees and flowers sit alongside the main path that leads <br />to Heron Bay Residential area. Overall, we are fostering a very relaxing, welcoming, and natural environment, which is <br />why lots of us bought the place in the very first place. Then, if there's an iron gate that's standing in the middle of it, the <br />gate is completely out of place and significantly deface our natural environment. Again, if the gate can provide values, <br />then we can sacrifice the look. But in this case, the gate doesn't provide such value. And our residential area has been <br />really safe, so the gate cannot help us. <br />To summarize, the gate is downright unnecessary, wastefully costly, out of place in a very natural environment. THUS, <br />MY NEIGHBORS AND I STRONGLY DISAGREE THAT THE GATE SHOULD BE INSTALLED. PLEASE <br />REJECT THE PROPOSAL! <br />We thank you very much! <br />Best, <br />Kevin <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.