My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action 2014 0902
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
Packet 2014 0902
>
10A Action 2014 0902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2014 10:09:04 AM
Creation date
8/26/2014 5:28:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
9/2/2014
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2014 0902 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0902
SA Reso 2014-004
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />30 <br />Each year the Board of Equalization announces the applicable adjustment factor. Since <br />the adoption of Proposition 13, inflation has, in most years, exceeded 2% and the announced <br />factor has reflected the 2% cap. The changes in the California Consumer Price Index from <br />October of one year and October of the next year are used to determine the adjustment factor <br />for the January assessment date. Through fiscal year 2010-11 there were six occasions when <br />the inflation factor was less than 2%. Until fiscal year 2010-11 the annual adjustment never <br />resulted in a reduction to the base year values of individual parcels; however, the factor that <br />was applied to real property assessed values for the January 1, 2010 assessment date <br />was -0.237% and this resulted in a reductions to the adjusted base year value of parcels. The <br />table below reflects the inflation adjustment factors for the current fiscal year, 10 prior fiscal <br />years and the adjustment factor for fiscal year 2014-15. The projections of Tax Revenues in <br />Tables 10, 11 and 12 below assume an annual growth factor of 2% per year commencing fiscal <br />year 2015-16. See “THE PROJECT AREAS - Projected Available Net Tax Increment and <br />Estimated Debt Service Coverage.” <br /> <br />Historical Inflation Adjustment Factors <br /> <br />Fiscal Year Inflation Adj. Factor <br />2003-04 2.000% <br />2004-05 1.867 <br />2005-06 2.000 <br />2006-07 2.000 <br />2007-08 2.000 <br />2008-09 2.000 <br />2009-10 2.000 <br />2010-11 -0.237 <br />2011-12 0.753 <br />2012-13 2.000 <br />2013-14 2.000 <br />2014-15 0.454 <br /> <br />Appropriations Limitation - Article XIIIB <br /> <br />Article XIIIB limits the annual appropriations of the State and its political subdivisions to <br />the level of appropriations for the prior fiscal year, as adjusted for changes in the cost of living, <br />population and services rendered by the government entity. The “base year” for establishing <br />such appropriations limit is the 1978/79 fiscal year, and the limit is to be adjusted annually to <br />reflect changes in population, consumer prices and certain increases in the cost of services <br />provided by these public agencies. <br /> <br />Section 33678 of the Redevelopment Law provides that the allocation of taxes to a <br />redevelopment agency for the purpose of paying principal of, or interest on, loans, advances, or <br />indebtedness shall not be deemed the receipt by a redevelopment agency of proceeds of taxes <br />levied by or on behalf of a redevelopment agency within the meaning of Article XIIIB, nor shall <br />such portion of taxes be deemed receipt of proceeds of taxes by, or an appropriation subject to <br />the limitation of, any other public body within the meaning or for the purpose of the Constitution <br />and laws of the State, including Section 33678 of the Redevelopment Law. The constitutionality <br />of Section 33678 has been upheld in two California appellate court decisions. On the basis of <br />these decisions, the Successor Agency has not adopted an appropriations limit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.