Laserfiche WebLink
<br />42 <br /> <br />Low and Moderate Income Housing Set-Aside <br /> <br />As described in “SECURITY FOR THE 2014 BONDS - Housing Set-Aside,” the <br />Dissolution Act eliminated the distinction between Housing Set-Aside and non-Housing Set- <br />Aside property tax revenues. The housing fund into which these set-aside amounts were <br />formerly deposited has been eliminated and any unencumbered amounts remaining in that fund <br />have been paid to the County and these funds have been allocated to the taxing entities within <br />the Project Areas. As a result, and because the Successor Agency has no obligations that are <br />payable from Housing Set-Aside, the former Housing Set-Aside is available to pay debt service <br />on the 2014 Bonds; the projection of Tax Revenues prepared by the Fiscal Consultant and set <br />forth in the section of this Official Statement entitled “THE PROJECT AREAS – Projected <br />Available Net Tax Increment and Estimated Debt Service Coverage,” assumes the availability of <br />the former Housing Set-Aside for this purpose. <br /> <br />Major Taxable Property Owners <br /> <br />Plaza Project Area. The following table lists the 10 largest taxable property owners <br />within the Plaza Project Area for fiscal year 2014-15. Based on fiscal year 2014-15 locally <br />assessed taxable valuations, the top 10 taxable property owners in the Plaza Project Area <br />represent approximately 46.5% of the total Plaza Project Area taxable value of $363,391,952 <br />and 50% of the fiscal year 2014-15 incremental value of $340,123,058. <br /> <br />The Fiscal Consultant reports that Creekside Plaza Partners LLC and certain of its <br />affiliates had appeals of assessed values pending as of June 30, 2014 relating to fiscal years <br />2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14 with respect to property with an assessed value totaling <br />approximately $38.5 million. According to the Fiscal Consultant, Creekside Plaza Partners <br />LLC’s opinion of value regarding such property totaled approximately $29.2 million; representing <br />a maximum potential reduction of approximately $9.3 million. The Fiscal Consultant further <br />reports that Long Drug Stores Inc. had an appeal of assessed value pending as of June 30, <br />2014 relating to fiscal year 2012-13 with respect to property with an assessed value of <br />approximately $6.8 million. According to the Fiscal Consultant, Long Drug Stores Inc.’s opinion <br />of value regarding such property totaled approximately $3.4 million; representing a maximum <br />potential reduction of approximately $3.4 million. However, as discussed below in “-Appeals of <br />Assessed Values; Proposition 8,” the Fiscal Consultant further reports that over the past seven <br />years, appeals of assessed values have resulted in a reduction on average of 7%. Based on <br />the Fiscal Consultants report, the Successor Agency anticipates that such appeals will result in <br />an aggregate loss of approximately $3.2 million in assessed value within the Plaza Project Area <br />in fiscal year 2014-15 or a loss of tax increment revenue of approximately $32,000. The Fiscal <br />Consultant's projections of tax increment available to pay debt service on the 2014 Bonds do <br />not take such potential reductions into account. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />