My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action 2014 0902
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
Packet 2014 0902
>
10A Action 2014 0902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2014 10:09:04 AM
Creation date
8/26/2014 5:28:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
9/2/2014
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2014 0902 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2014\Packet 2014 0902
SA Reso 2014-004
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />65 <br />Litigation <br /> <br />There is no action, suit or proceeding known to the Successor Agency to be pending and <br />notice of which has been served upon and received by the Successor Agency, or threatened, <br />restraining or enjoining the execution or delivery of the 2014 Bonds or the Indenture or in any <br />way contesting or affecting the validity of the foregoing or any proceedings of the Successor <br />Agency taken with respect to any of the foregoing. See, however, “RISK FACTORS- <br />Challenges to Dissolution Act”. <br /> <br />Rating <br /> <br />Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC, a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, <br />Inc. (“S&P”) has assigned its municipal bond rating of “___” to the 2014 Bonds. <br /> <br />This rating reflects only the view of S&P, and an explanation of the significance of the <br />rating, and any outlook assigned to or associated with the rating, should be obtained from the <br />S&P. <br /> <br />Generally, a rating agency bases its rating on the information and materials furnished to <br />it and on investigations, studies and assumptions of its own. The Successor Agency has <br />provided certain additional information and materials to S&P (some of which does not appear in <br />this Official Statement). <br /> <br />There is no assurance that this rating will continue for any given period of time or that <br />this rating will not be revised downward or withdrawn entirely by S&P, if in the judgment of S&P, <br />circumstances so warrant. Any such downward revision or withdrawal of any rating on the 2014 <br />Bonds may have an adverse effect on the market price or marketability of the 2014 Bonds. <br /> <br />Continuing Disclosure <br /> <br />The Successor Agency will covenant for the benefit of owners of the 2014 Bonds to <br />provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the Successor Agency by not <br />later than March 31 after the end of each fiscal year of the Successor Agency (currently June <br />30th), commencing not later than March 31, 2015 with the report for the 2013-14 fiscal year (the <br />“Annual Report”), and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain listed events. The <br />specific nature of the information to be contained in the Annual Report or the notices of listed <br />events is summarized in “APPENDIX D - FORM OF SUCCESSOR AGENCY CONTINUING <br />DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE,” attached to this Official Statement. These covenants have been <br />made in order to assist the Underwriter (as defined below) in complying with Securities <br />Exchange Commission Rule 15c2 12(b)(5) (the “Rule”). <br /> <br />The City and its related governmental entities, including the Successor Agency, have <br />previously entered into numerous disclosure undertakings under the Rule in connection with the <br />issuance of long-term obligations. See “APPENDIX E - SUCCESSOR AGENCY FINANCIAL <br />STATEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-13.” [The City and the City's affiliated governmental <br />entities have determined that certain filings relating to three issuances of tax allocation bonds of <br />the Former Agency failed to include budget information and financial reports required by the <br />related undertakings. The City’s has further determined that previous filings relating to three <br />issuances of certificates of participation of the City also omitted certain fund balance amounts <br />and statements of tax increment received as required by the related undertakings. In particular, <br />with respect to one fiscal year, the City failed to file the audited financial statements and the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.