My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
4A Public Hearing 2015 0120
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
Packet 2015 0120
>
4A Public Hearing 2015 0120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 5:08:32 PM
Creation date
1/14/2015 5:45:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/20/2015
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2015 0120 CS+RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2015\Packet 2015 0120
PowerPoint 4A Public Hearing 2015 0120 Housing Element
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2015\Packet 2015 0120
Reso 2015-006
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2015
Reso 2015-007
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro <br />Housing Element Update (2015-2023) Project <br />Initial Study and Environmental Checklist <br />e) Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ofpeople? <br />Odors are also an important element of local air quality conditions. Specific activities allowed within each <br />land use category can raise concerns related to odors on the part of nearby neighbors. Major sources of odors <br />include restaurants and wastewater treatment plants. While sources that generate objectionable odors must <br />comply with air quality regulations, the public's sensitivity to locally produced odors often exceeds regulatory <br />thresholds. <br />The type of housing development that could occur under the proposed Project is not considered a major <br />source of odor and would not create objectionable odors to surrounding sensitive land uses. Accordingly, <br />there would be no impact. <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potentially With <br />Significant Mitigation Less Than No <br />Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant Impact <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through <br />habitat modifications, on a plant or animal population, or es- <br />sential habitat, defined as a candidate, sensitive or special- <br />❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br />status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regula- <br />tions, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or <br />other sensitive natural community identified in local or re- <br />gional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California De- <br />❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br />partment of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser- <br />vice? <br />c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wet- <br />lands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (in- <br />cluding, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.), <br />❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br />through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or <br />other means? <br />d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resi- <br />dent or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established <br />❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br />native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the <br />use of native wildlife nursery sites? <br />e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting bio- <br />logical resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordi- <br />❑ ❑ ❑ <br />nance? <br />Conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural <br />Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, re- <br />❑ ❑ ❑ E <br />gional, or state habitat conservation plan? <br />a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on a plant or animal <br />population, or essential habitat, defined as a candidate, sensitive or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, <br />or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />Special status plants include those listed as "Endangered," "Threatened," or "Candidate for Listing" by the <br />California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), that are <br />included in the California Rare Plant Rank, or that are considered special -status in local or regional plans, pol- <br />icies, or regulations. Special status animals include those listed as "Endangered," "Threatened," or "Candidate <br />Page 120 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.