Laserfiche WebLink
City of San Leandro <br />Housing Element Update (2015-2023) Project <br />Initial Studv and Environmental Checklist <br />ject would not change Section 4-1906 and would not change existing development standards. Therefore, no <br />impact would occur. <br />J) Would the project conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other <br />approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? <br />The City of San Leandro is not within the boundaries of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural <br />Community Conservation Plan, or other conservation plan. This condition precludes the possibility of the <br />proposed project conflicting with an adopted conservation plan. Consequently, there would be no impact. <br />Furthermore, there are no housing sites within the area covered by the Shoreline Marshlands Enhancement <br />Program (General Plan Policy 26.05 and Action 26.05-A). <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially With <br />V. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br />Significant Mitigation Less Than No <br />Would the project: Impact Incorporated Significant Impact <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a <br />historical resource as defined in California Code of Regula- <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />tions Section 15064.5? <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an <br />archaeological resource pursuant to California Code of Regu- <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />lations Section 15064.5? <br />c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological re- <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />source or site or unique geologic feature? <br />d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />of formal cemeteries? <br />a) Mould the project cause a substantial adverse cbange in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section <br />15064.5? <br />The types of cultural resources that meet the definition of historical resources under CEQA generally consist <br />of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are significant for their traditional, cultural, and/or <br />historical associations. Commonly, the two main resource types that are subject to impact, and that may be <br />impacted by potential future development allowed under the proposed Project, are historical archaeological <br />deposits and historical architectural resources, as discussed below. Human remains are addressed in Section <br />V.d below. <br />Cultural resources are protected by federal and State regulations and standards, including, but not limited to, <br />the National Historic Preservation Act, the California Public Resources Code, and CEQA. If the potential <br />future development under the proposed Project or adjacent properties are found to be eligible for listing on <br />the California Register, the development would be required to conform to the current Secretary of the Interi- <br />or's Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, and Re- <br />storing Historic Buildings, which require the preservation of character defining features which convey a build- <br />ing's historical significance, and offers guidance about appropriate and compatible alterations to such struc- <br />tures. <br />Historical and pre -contact archaeological deposits that meet the definition of historical resources under <br />CEQA could be damaged or destroyed by ground -disturbing activities associated with potential future devel- <br />Page 123 <br />