My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2A Work Session 2015 0126
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2015
>
Packet 2015 0126
>
2A Work Session 2015 0126
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2015 9:59:45 AM
Creation date
1/21/2015 4:33:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
1/26/2015
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2015 0126 CSAmended+WS
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2015\Packet 2015 0126
PowerPoint 2A Work Session 2015 0126 Shoreline DEIR
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2015\Packet 2015 0126
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2022
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT DRAFT EIR <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />AESTHETICS <br />According to the urban decay analysis, based on current demand, after the hotel component of the <br />Project is constructed there would be a 74 percent overall occupancy rate within the Oakland -Hayward <br />trade area and a 73 percent occupancy rate in the midscale and upper-midscale class market segment in <br />this trade area. The analysis determined that the Project would not increase the aggregate supply levels <br />for hotels such that the occupancy rate would fall below 60 percent, which is considered to be the <br />threshold at which hotels generally become unprofitable and represent an unhealthy market. Moreover, <br />this analysis found that it is unlikely that the Project would lower occupancy rates below 70 percent which <br />is considered to be a healthy level. This means that the hotel market would not be overbuilt and it is <br />unlikely that the Project would result in urban decay which could alter the visual character of the Project <br />site or its surroundings. As a result, a less -than -significant impact would occur with respect to urban <br />decay. <br />Shade and Shadows <br />In order to assess the potential changes to the character of the site resulting from shade and shadows <br />that would result from structures proposed by the Project, a shading study was conducted. The diagrams <br />included in Appendix C, Shade/Shadow Diagrams, show the shade/shadow on four days of the year; the <br />spring equinox, summer solstice, fall equinox, and the winter solstice. Additionally, in order to provide a <br />summary of the shade/shadow created by the Project, four times throughout each day are depicted: <br />9:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 3:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. The diagrams in Appendix C only include shade/shadow <br />created by the Project buildings, as represented by worst-case building massing.6 <br />A significant impact to aesthetics could result with respect to shade and shadows if new development cast <br />significantly large shadows on existing buildings, gathering areas, and/or its general surroundings, such <br />that the character of the site was significantly, adversely altered. The diagrams showing the shade/shadow <br />on the summer and winter solstice represent the extreme locations of the sun relative to the planet <br />throughout the year and therefore show the most extreme shade/shadow created by the Project. The <br />diagrams showing the shade/shadow on the spring and fall equinoxes represent average shade/shadow <br />created by the Project. In order to determine whether or not the Project would substantially degrade the <br />existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings as a result of shade and shadow <br />impacts, the diagrams showing the shade/shadow on the summer and winter solstice are most useful for <br />a conservative analysis. As these diagrams show, the shadows cast by the proposed buildings would not <br />substantially shade existing buildings or gathering places, on- or off-site, under even the most extreme <br />conditions. Moreover, these most extreme conditions, while cyclical, would be temporary. For these <br />reasons, the shade/shadow impacts of the Project would not be significant. <br />Overall, as discussed above, the Project would result in substantial changes on the site which would affect <br />the site's visual appearance and character. However, since the proposed changes would be consistent with <br />the San Leandro General Plan and would result in preservation of most views, increase in water views of <br />the harbor through improvements to the promenade and addition of public lookouts, removal of <br />dilapidated structures, provision of attractive low -profile structures and landscaping, and a more vibrant <br />shoreline, the changes would not result in a degradation of the existing site character. Additionally, Project <br />6 Note: The shade/shadow analysis only depicts shade/shadow from buildings proposed by the Project, and does not include <br />potential shade/shadow from landscaping features and/or existing structures. <br />4.1-34 )EC.EAA9Ed 2 0 ➢ 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.