Laserfiche WebLink
Davis Street — Doolittle Drive Intersection Improvements <br />Traffic Impact Fee Justification — AB 1600 Report <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />Analysis of Benefit Assessments for Proposed Traffic Improvements of <br />Davis Street and Doolittle Drive by TJKM Traffic Engineers dated December 23, 2004 <br />(Traffic Report), calculated the proportion of traffic growth generated in the proposed <br />impact fee areas to all additional traffic using the Davis -Doolittle intersection between <br />2003 and 2025 by completing an origin and destination analysis. As shown in Table 1, <br />TJKM has determined, on a square foot basis, the amount of traffic added by new <br />development in the proposed impact fee areas. <br />Table 1: Travel Growth at Davis Street and Doolittle Drive <br />" ksf = gross floor area in thousands of square feet <br />Percent Contribution of Zones 1 to 8 to total growth in traffic am. Peak 49.1% <br />Percent Contribution of Zones 1 to 8 to total growth in traffic p.m. Peak 54.9% <br />Consequently, the proposed fee will fund right-of-way acquisition, design and <br />construction of intersection improvements including traffic signal modifications required <br />to mitigate impacts of increased vehicular trips at the intersection in direct proportion to <br />the actual increase in trips through the intersection that the traffic zones contribute, <br />thereby, creating a reasonable relationship between the fee and the type of development <br />in the proposed impact fee areas. <br />DETERMINE HOW THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN <br />THE NEED FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITY AND THE TYPE OF <br />DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED <br />(GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001 (A)(4)) <br />A reasonable relationship exists between the need for the proposed intersection <br />improvements and the type of development because the proposed intersection <br />improvements were identified based on the projected increase in traffic generated. due to <br />anticipated increase in development in the traffic impact areas, by the year 2025. <br />Existing <br />Future <br />Difference <br />TRIPS ENTERING DAVIS/DOOLITTLE <br />Difference <br />Land use Land Use <br />TAZ <br />(ksf)* <br />(ksf) <br />(ksf) <br />Existing <br />Future(From Model) <br />(Future -Existing) <br />a.m. <br />p.m. <br />a.m. <br />p.m. <br />a.m. <br />p.m. <br />all <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />2640 <br />2992 <br />3279 <br />3699 <br />639 <br />70771 <br />1 <br />1489.9 <br />1773.1 <br />283.2 <br />33 <br />80 <br />42 <br />83 <br />9 <br />3 <br />2 <br />160.0 <br />180.0 <br />20.0 <br />33 <br />287 <br />42 <br />317 <br />9 <br />30 <br />3 <br />2311.7 <br />4040.3 <br />1728.6 <br />438 <br />413 <br />518 <br />499 <br />80 <br />86 <br />4 <br />2405.0 <br />4176.4 <br />1771.3 <br />385 <br />417 <br />443 <br />481 <br />58 <br />64 <br />5 <br />1389.0 <br />2090.0 <br />700.9 <br />191 <br />377 <br />197 <br />386 <br />6 <br />9 <br />6 <br />2772.7 <br />4070.6 <br />1297.9 <br />64 <br />91 <br />52 <br />138 <br />.12 <br />47 <br />7 <br />Airport <br />Expansion <br />332 <br />614 <br />446 <br />716 <br />114 <br />102 <br />8 <br />603.5 <br />1159.1 <br />555.6 <br />31 <br />75 <br />78 <br />172 <br />47 <br />97 <br />TOTALS <br />11131.8 <br />1 17489.5 <br />6357.6 <br />1507 <br />2354 <br />1818 <br />2792 <br />314 <br />388 <br />" ksf = gross floor area in thousands of square feet <br />Percent Contribution of Zones 1 to 8 to total growth in traffic am. Peak 49.1% <br />Percent Contribution of Zones 1 to 8 to total growth in traffic p.m. Peak 54.9% <br />Consequently, the proposed fee will fund right-of-way acquisition, design and <br />construction of intersection improvements including traffic signal modifications required <br />to mitigate impacts of increased vehicular trips at the intersection in direct proportion to <br />the actual increase in trips through the intersection that the traffic zones contribute, <br />thereby, creating a reasonable relationship between the fee and the type of development <br />in the proposed impact fee areas. <br />DETERMINE HOW THERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN <br />THE NEED FOR THE PUBLIC FACILITY AND THE TYPE OF <br />DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ON WHICH THE FEE IS IMPOSED <br />(GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66001 (A)(4)) <br />A reasonable relationship exists between the need for the proposed intersection <br />improvements and the type of development because the proposed intersection <br />improvements were identified based on the projected increase in traffic generated. due to <br />anticipated increase in development in the traffic impact areas, by the year 2025. <br />