Laserfiche WebLink
File Number: 15-259 <br />as the Bancroft/Callan Memorial Park are not on the list. D. Pollart responded by saying that <br />the parks infrastructure doesn't have the funding mechanism for maintenance, which is why <br />the City partners with companies such as KaBoom to replace park structures. <br />K. Cooke reviewed that we are currently budgeting for about $3.5M General Fund contribution <br />but cautioned that the amount can change as the budget process continues. He expressed <br />that the need is to prioritize the projects so that when a final budget number is determined, the <br />appropriate projects would be funded. C. Zapata discussed potential funding distributions to <br />be proposed for the budget. <br />Discussion ensued about the Police Building (PD) Project whereby Councilmember Reed <br />asked for clarification on the cost and the ranking position of the project. She wants to be <br />clear on what she is recommending, adding that the issue is what the community will see: <br />tangible versus non -tangible. <br />Councilmember Lopez asked about the PD Building and South Office modifications project <br />and wanted to know why it was so expensive. Discussion ensued. N. Thom recommended <br />that once this project is funded, it should be funded every year until the project is completed. <br />The conceptual design phase is complete and the next steps are to complete the design, go <br />out to bid and do the construction. <br />Councilmember Lopez said she would like to see the money re -distributed to the whole town. <br />She would like to have conversations about other assets for the community beyond public <br />safety and not have money centered in one place such as the PD Building. A suggestion was <br />made about "lease bid buy-back" as it relates to the PD Building. <br />Mayor Cutter asked about how streets are chosen for repair. K. Cooke responded by "area <br />maintenance method" for annual street sealing, but by worst condition first for street <br />reconstruction. K. Cooke provided a list of streets for reconstruction for the Committee <br />Members based on Pavement Condition Index (PCI). <br />2.C. Discussion Regarding Street Sealing, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Program <br />Discussion started on the general issues regarding selecting street for sealing, rehabilitation <br />and reconstruction. K. Cooke reviewed the PCI graph and highlighted the high cost difference <br />between maintenance and reconstruction. K. Cooke provided a recap of the funding sources <br />and expressed the importance of utilizing Measure BB funds ($30M or $6M for five years). <br />Funds from Measure HH/General Fund will provide $1 M, which will be used for street <br />rehabilitation. K. Cooke said that the key plan is to maintain streets at the most cost effective <br />way and at a cost of about $7.5M per year for sealing and rehabilitation. Any funding above <br />the $7.5M would go towards reconstruction projects. K. Cooke reviewed slides that indicate <br />the coverage of the work and said the map showing street work will be available on-line. A list <br />was provided of the streets for reconstruction. <br />Councilmember Reed requested a listing of streets project on the web site. The Committee <br />was in general agreement with the development of the Street Sealing, Rehabilitation and <br />Reconstruction Program. Mayor Cutter suggested additional evaluation criteria be reviewed <br />that considers the density of residences on a particular street. <br />City of San Leandro Page 5 Printed on 4/28/2015 <br />