Laserfiche WebLink
Annual Rent Review Program Evaluation <br />FY 2014-2015 <br /> <br />Page 9 of 11 <br /> <br /> Mr. Leo West’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-34) was heard at the March 24th, 2015 <br />Rent Review Board Hearing. The $145 rent increase was invalidated after landlord notified <br />the City that he would be unable to be present at the hearing due to a plumbing emergency. <br />His landlord has given him a re-notice, and his same $145 rent increase will be heard at the <br />June 16th, 2015 Rent Review Board Hearing (Special Meeting). The $145 rent increase was <br />again invalidated after the landlord was not present at the June 16, 2015 hearing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Shafiqah Goins’ Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-36) was heard at the March 24th, <br />2015 Rent Review Board Hearing. Her $100 rent increase was upheld by the Board. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marco Oztiz’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-37) was heard at the March 24th, <br />2015 Rent Review Board Hearing. The $110 rent increase was invalidated after the landlord <br />notified the City that he would be unable to be present at the hearing due to an emergency. <br /> <br /> Ms. Krystel Geeter’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-38) was resolved prior to the <br />March 24th, 2015 Rent Review Board Hearing. The $75 rent increase (her 2nd rent increase in <br />a 12-month period) was rescinded. <br /> <br /> Mr. Carthan Bland’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-39) was closed/resolved after he <br />and his landlord negotiated a mutually satisfactory resolution ($75 instead of $150 rent <br />increase). <br /> <br /> Mr. Todd Washington’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-40) was closed/resolved prior <br />to the April 28th Rent Review Board Hearing after he and his landlord negotiated a mutually <br />satisfactory resolution ($190 rent increase takes effect while Mr. Washington has his carpet <br />replaced and his unit repainted). <br /> <br /> Mrs. Sonja and Mr. Paul Wright’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-41) was <br />closed/resolved prior to the April 28th Rent Review Board Hearing after they and their <br />landlord negotiated a mutually satisfactory resolution ($250 rent increase takes effect while <br />the unit will be upgraded/repaired). <br /> <br /> Ms. Debbie Bissell’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-42) was closed/resolved after she <br />and her landlord negotiated a mutually satisfactory resolution ($75 instead of $125 rent <br />increase). <br /> <br /> Ms. Laura Clark’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-43) was closed/resolved after she <br />and her landlord negotiated a mutually satisfactory resolution ($75 instead of $180 rent <br />increase). <br /> <br /> Mr. Felix Ramirez’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-44) was closed/resolved. The $65 <br />rent increase amount is ineligible to be reviewed by the Rent Review Board. <br /> <br /> Mr. Vincent Hidalgo’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-45) was closed/resolved. The <br />$65 rent increase amount is ineligible to be reviewed by the Rent Review Board. <br />