Laserfiche WebLink
Annual Rent Review Program Evaluation <br />FY 2014-2015 <br /> <br />Page 7 of 11 <br /> <br />Mr. Molina’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-13) was dismissed at the November 25, <br />2014 Rent Review Board Hearing after Mr. Molina failed to appear without good cause. <br /> Ms. Intengan’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-14) was closed/resolved when Ms. <br />Intengan was re-noticed properly prior to the November 25, 2014 Rent Review Board <br />Hearing. Landlord agreed to a $75 rent increase (reduced from $125). <br /> <br /> Ms. Lee-Figueroa’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-15) was mutually resolved prior to <br />the scheduled November 25, 2014 Rent Review Board Hearing to a $75 rent increase <br />(reduced from $100). <br /> <br /> Ms. Rodarte’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-16) was discussed at the November 25, <br />2014 Rent Review Board Hearing with a determination that Ms. Rodarte needed to be <br />provided with a new 60-day rent increase notice ($100 rent increase is more than 10%). <br /> <br /> Mr. Saavedra’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-17) was mutually resolved at the <br />November 25, 2014 Rent Review Board Hearing to a $50 rent increase (reduced from $100). <br /> <br /> Ms. Poole’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-18) was heard at the November 25, 2014 <br />Rent Review Board Hearing. A Continuance Hearing was heard at the December 16, 2014 <br />Rent Review Board Hearing. Ms. Poole and her landlord did not reach a mutually <br />satisfactory resolution. Ms. Poole’s $140 rent increase will take effect. Ms. Poole and her <br />landlord did eventually come to a mutual resolution. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rains’ Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-19) was mutually resolved prior to the <br />scheduled November 25, 2014 Rent Review Board Hearing as Ms. Rains indicated she was <br />moving out. <br /> <br /> Mr. Elias’ Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-20) was ineligible to be reviewed by the Rent <br />Review Board as he submitted his Rent Review Request form past the 15-day requirement. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ortega’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-21) was closed/resolved. Landlord has <br />agreed to re-notice with the required Rent Review Notice Ordinance language. The $50 rent <br />increase amount is ineligible to be reviewed by the Rent Review Board. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ludivina Sierra’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-22) was heard at the January 27, <br />2015 Rent Review Board Hearing. A Continuance Hearing was heard on February 24, 2015. <br />Rent increase amount is $150. Board recommended forwarding the case to City Council for <br />their review. The case was closed without resolution. With help from the Rental Housing <br />Association (RHA), tenant and landlord mutually agreed to a resolution ($50 rent increase for <br />1st 4 months; $150 rent increase beginning the 5th month). <br /> <br /> Ms. Bernadette Bradford’s Rent Review Board Case (RRB2014-23) was heard at the <br />February 24, 2015 Rent Review Board Hearing. Rent increase amount is $270. Board <br />recommended forwarding the case to City Council for their review. The case was closed <br />without resolution. With help from RHA, tenant and landlord mutually agreed to a resolution <br />($245 instead of $270 rent increase).