My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8H Consent 2016 0620
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 0620
>
8H Consent 2016 0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2016 1:07:43 PM
Creation date
6/14/2016 3:58:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
6/20/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2016 0620 CS + RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2016\Packet 2016 0620
Reso 2016-079
(Amended by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
File Number: 16-307 <br />choose to use the percentage rate of change in population within the city or county, whichever <br />is higher. <br />ANALYSIS <br />The Appropriation Limit for prior fiscal years was predominantly based on the county <br />population factor multiplied by the assessed valuation change factor. After the passage of <br />Proposition 111, cities are able to use the higher of the population factors (city or county) and <br />the higher of the California per capita personal income factor or the Non-residential property <br />assessed valuation growth factor. This amended approach has been retroactively applied to <br />fiscal years 1990-91 through 2010-11 to recalculate the ending limits. The revised <br />calculations will continue to be applied in subsequent years. <br />For fiscal year 2016-17 staff is using the County Population Growth factor of 1.06% multiplied <br />by the State of California per Capita Income factor 5.37% since Alameda County’s population <br />factor is higher than the City of San Leandro’s population factor of 0.56%. Similarly, the State <br />of California per Capita Income factor is higher than the City’s non-residential new <br />construction growth factor of 0.06%. The non-residential assessed valuation factor for <br />2015-16 included “new construction” of $42 million for Chill Build LLC (Preferred Freezer) <br />which has been completed and no longer reflected under new construction. <br />The calculated 2015-16 Appropriation Limit of $191,284,931 multiplied by the adjustment <br />factor of 1.0649 produces the 2016-17 Appropriation Limit of $203,693,435. A Resolution is <br />attached which authorizes the new Appropriation Limit for next fiscal year and includes the <br />calculation as Attachment 1. The actual budget subject to the limitation excludes <br />self-supporting funds, capital improvement funds, capital outlay grant funds and specific <br />exclusions such as the Gas Tax Fund. The fiscal year 2016-17 appropriation subject to the <br />Gann Limit is $95,593,423 and is significantly below the Appropriation Limit by over $108 <br />million. <br />Current City Council Policy <br />The Council adopts the appropriation limit during the budget adoption process. <br />Fiscal Impact <br />None. Impacts the City only if the appropriation limit is exceeded by the proposed fiscal year <br />2016-17 appropriation subject to limitation. <br />Attachments <br />·Attachment 1 - Gann Appropriation Limitation Calculation 2016-17 <br />PREPARED BY: David Baum, Finance Director, Finance <br />Page 2 City of San Leandro Printed on 6/14/2016
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.