Laserfiche WebLink
File Number: 16-274 <br />EBMUD charges users far more (4-5 times the City’s cost to produce) for reclaimed water <br />than what the City sells the water to EBMUD for. The WPCP is also talking with Waste <br />Management about their future need for use of reclaimed water in their onsite operations. <br />Lastly, as the Shoreline Project proceeds, the City will be in conversation with the developer <br />about installing purple pipe in order to facilitate use of reclaimed water in the project. <br />2.B.Discussion Regarding Sanitary Sewer Capacity Study & Master Plan <br />K. Cooke introduced the discussion on the Sanitary Sewer Capacity Study & Master Plan <br />noting that the duration was extended due to the lack of rain needed for measurement and <br />that the study cost approximately $500,000. Nick Thom presented an update on the Sanitary <br />Sewer Capacity Study & Master Plan (PowerPoint included). <br />The 1992 Sanitary Sewer Master Plan has been replaced with a new master plan dated 2015. <br />The new master plan started in 20111-12 evaluated demand upon the system due to changes <br />in zoning under the downtown TOD Strategy as well as zoning changes anticipated in the <br />City’s General Plan 2035 which is currently under development. <br />The 2015 Master Plan concludes that our system is adequate for current demand and <br />recommends 11 projects at approximately $3 million needed to increase capacity to the <br />amount required for full build out of our 2035 General Plan. These projects will be added to <br />CIP list for evaluation and ranking. Sanitary sewer improvement projects are eligible for <br />funding by WPCP Enterprise Fund. <br />D. Wilson: Collection system is regulated, so the capacity analysis within this master plan is a <br />requirement. We anticipate that the State will audit our records soon. <br />Councilmember Lopez: What prompted audit? <br />D. Wilson: Audits are routinely conducted of all sanitary sewer system operators. <br />2.C.Discussion Regarding Parklets <br />Keith Cooke presented information to the Committee on parklets. (PowerPoint included). <br />Staff proposes and seeks input from the Committee for a pilot program for Parklets in San <br />Leandro. San Francisco defines Parklets as an economical solution to the desire and need for <br />wider sidewalks and they are intended to provide space for the general public to sit and enjoy <br />the space where existing sidewalks would preclude such occupancy. Staff proposes releasing <br />an RFP for 3-5 locations to pilot and will collect data which will then be used to draft <br />ordinance. Staff will also reference what other local agencies (SF, Oakland) have in place for <br />parklet ordinances & programs. <br />Safety is the foremost consideration. Need to consider risks and as such, find roadways with <br />low speed, no obstruction such as hydrants, space needs to be accessible. No table service <br />allowed if fronting establishment that serve food and drink. Other agencies review possible <br />locations on a case by case basis. <br />Page 3 City of San Leandro Printed on 6/28/2016