My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
4B1 Public Hearing 2016 0919
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 0919
>
4B1 Public Hearing 2016 0919
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2016 3:00:58 PM
Creation date
9/13/2016 3:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
9/19/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-117
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO GENERAL PLAN UPDATE FINAL EIR <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />LTS = Less Than Significant S = Significant SU = Significant Unavoidable Impact N/A = Not Applicable <br />2-10 AUGUST 2016 <br />TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES <br />Impact <br />Significance <br />before <br />Mitigation Mitigation Measures <br />Significance <br />after <br />Mitigation <br />LAND USE AND PLANNING <br />LAND-1: The proposed project would not physically divide <br />an established community. <br />LTS N/A N/A <br />LAND-2: The proposed project would not conflict with any <br />applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an <br />agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but <br />not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal <br />program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose <br />of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. <br />LTS N/A N/A <br />LAND-3: The proposed project would not conflict with any <br />applicable habitat conservation plan or natural <br />community conservation plan. <br />No Impact N/A N/A <br />LAND-4: Implementation of the proposed project, in <br />combination with past, present, and reasonable <br />foreseeable projects, would result in less-than-significant <br />cumulative impacts with respect to land use and planning. <br />LTS N/A N/A <br />NOISE <br />NOI-1: The proposed project would not generate noise <br />levels in excess of standards established in the General <br />Plan or the Municipal Code, and/or the applicable <br />standards of other agencies. <br />N/A N/A N/A <br />NOI-2: The proposed project could generate excessive <br />groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. <br />LTS N/A N/A <br />NOI-3: The proposed project would cause a substantial <br />permanent increase in ambient transportation-related <br />noise levels in the project vicinity. <br />S NOI-3: Beyond the General Plan Environmental Hazards Element <br />policies discussed above, the following mitigation measures were <br />considered, but as described below, were found to be infeasible. <br />Technological Advances for Noise-Generating Vehicles <br />Most urban noise results from the use of roadway vehicles, including <br />automobiles, motorcycles, and trucks. The implementation of <br />improved technologies for the prevention or muffling of noise from <br />these sources could theoretically prevent substantial increases to <br />ambient noise levels; however, this approach would be infeasible as <br />much of this implementation is beyond the jurisdiction of the City. <br />Beyond currently-accepted State and industry standards and best <br />SU
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.