Laserfiche WebLink
COMMENT LETTER # A01 <br />June 23, 2016 <br />Tom Uao, Deputy Community Development, Director <br />Community Development Department <br />City of San Leandro <br />83S East lVh Streer. San Leandro, CA 94577 <br />RE: San 11-0andrl) Draft General Plan Update EnvironmentM Impact Report <br />Dear Mr. Llao, <br />Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft +Generali Plan Update and associated <br />Environmental Impact Report (EIR)- The EW Bay Regional Park District owns and manages over <br />120.000 acres of open space and active transportation trails in both Alameda and Contra Costa A01 -01 <br />Counties. The District is interested in how the Draft General Plan Update and EIR might affect Oyster <br />Bay Regional Shoreline, the East Say Greenway, and the San Francisco Say Trail, especially as it relates <br />to projected sea level rise in the area. <br />An initial review of the Draft 2035 General Plan Map shows conversion of open spaM sections of a <br />golf course, to Medium Density Residential. As stewards of open space in the region, we would prefer <br />to see more infill development rather than conversion of open space to residential land uses. The A01 -02 <br />suitability of the golf course for residential land uses should also be studied, especially in terms of <br />hydrology. I <br />We would also suggest that the planning consider-ations for sea level rise be Included in the <br />Conservation and Sustainability section of the General Plan Update rather than as a memorandum in <br />the appendices. This discussion should include the more recent sea level rise projections that San <br />Francisco Say Conservation and Development Commission {BCD C) staff provided in their Notice of A01 -03 <br />Preparation comment letter. BCDC, staff should also be able to provide you with a more recent sea <br />level rise map that is based on the best available science than the one that was included in the <br />appendix. I <br />In terms of the Draft BR, we are particularly Interested in potential impacts to Public Services and <br />Recreation in addition to public access and green infrastructure that protects the shoreline from sea <br />level rise. As mentioned above, we have concems regarding the 187 -acre public golf course that <br />includes open space and recreational facilities, Conversion of 10 acres of this open space would result A01 -04 <br />in physically akered parks and recreational facilities, regardless if there is a net increase in these <br />facilities throughout the City. This potential impact would need, to be analyzed and potentially <br />mitigated. Policy OSC-2.2, specifically states that <br />