My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action 2016 1017
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1017
>
10A Action 2016 1017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2016 11:12:31 AM
Creation date
10/12/2016 11:12:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
10/17/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-001 PFA
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br />29 <br />General Economic Condition and Outlook of the City. Commencing in 2008, the City <br />took a number of steps to address the negative impacts of the economic downturn of that time <br />on the financial condition of the City. These changes remain in place and inform the future <br />budgets of the City. The following discussion describes annual economic conditions of the City <br />with measures taken recently, including projections and steps that were targeted for Fiscal Year <br />2015–16 and that are planned for Fiscal Year 2016–17. <br />Fiscal Year 2013–14. In Fiscal Year 2013–14, data indicated further recovery <br />from the 2008 recession in the City, as median home prices rose to $435,000 and the <br />unemployment rate dropped to 5.6%. Property taxes saw a slight increase to $883,000 <br />compared to the 2012–13 Fiscal Year. Sales tax revenue continued to increase as well, <br />growing by $2.8 million compared to that of the prior fiscal year, and was attributed to <br />the growth of consumer confidence in the City. At the end of Fiscal Year 2013–14, the <br />unassigned fund balance of the General Fund was $18.8 million, while the total fund <br />balance was $29.6 million, an increase of $4.3 million over that of the prior fiscal year. <br />These increases were due primarily to the growth of property taxes to 5% in addition to a <br />raised sales tax of 10.6%. <br /> <br />Fiscal Year 2014–15. The City finished Fiscal Year 2014–15 with an assigned <br />and unassigned General Fund balance of approximately $34,811,556. While there <br />continued to be signs of an economic recovery in the City, median home prices <br />remained at $500,000, still less than the median price at the 2006 peak. The <br />unemployment rate in the City was less than 6%. Despite the improving housing market, <br />which represents 63% of the City’s tax roll, there was no growth in taxable assessed <br />value for Fiscal Year 2014–15. Lower interest rates boosted purchases of large ticket <br />items, such as automobiles and home improvements, which increased sales tax revenue <br />by 13% in the City. With the passage of Measure HH and a 0.5% sales tax increase <br />effective April 1, 2015, as described below, the half–cent sales tax added $2 million in <br />sales tax revenue in the fiscal year. Additionally, key enterprise funds including the <br />Water Pollution Control Plant and the Shoreline Enterprise Fund, saw revenues slightly <br />improving over the last year. Program revenues to the Water Pollution Control Plan <br />Enterprise fund totaled $13 million, an 8% increase from the prior year. Similarly <br />revenues to the Shoreline Enterprise Fund total $2.04 million, a 6% increases from the <br />prior year. <br /> <br />While the City has implemented considerable expenditure and service reductions <br />to balance its budget, it continues to face increased operating costs. For example, as <br />described below, the City’s contribution rates for employee pensions continue to rise due <br />to prior portfolio losses and a change in actuarial assumptions by CalPERS, with <br />additional increases projected in future years. The City has offset some of these <br />increases with reductions in staff in recent years, and will be working with employee <br />groups over future years to address this growing cost. See “– Retirement System,” <br />below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.