Ord 2016-012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

2. Content and Procedure for Notice of Hearing for Site Review. Written notification of the time, place, and purpose of the hearing by either the Zoning Enforcement Official or Site Development Sub -Commission shall be mailed to the applicant, property owner, and property owners adjoining and across the street from the subject site, not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 3. Administrative Review for Proiects Where Hearing is Not Required. For project where noticing is not required, Zoning Enforcement Official may take action on the application without holding a public hearing. (Ord. 2001-015 § 1) 5-2510 Appeals A. A Decision by Zoning Enforcement Official may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Adjustments pursuant to the requirements of Article 28. B. A Decision by Site Development Sub -Commission may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Adjustments pursuant to the requirements of Article 28. C. A Decision by Board of Zoning Adjustments may be appealed to the City Council pursuant to the requirements of Article 28. (Ord. 2001-015 § 1) 5-2512 Site Plan Review Standards To approve or conditionally approve a Site Plan, the decision maker or the decision making body shall find that the proposal is in substantial compliance with the following standards: A. Site plan elements (such as, but not limited to, building placement, yard setbacks, size and location of landscape areas, parking facilities, and placement of service areas) are in compliance with the minimum requirements of this Code and are arranged as to achieve the intent of such requirements by providing a harmonious and orderly development that is compatible with its surroundings. Parking, loading, storage, and service areas are appropriately screened by building placement, orientation walls, and/or landscaping. B. The building(s) has(have) adequate articulation, with appropriate window placement, use of detailing, and/or changes in building planes to provide visual interest. The exterior materials, finishes, detailing, and colors are compatible with those of surrounding structures. Visually incompatible elements, such as roof - mounted utilities, are fully screened from public view. If the proposal is for an addition to an existing building, such additions shall appear as an integral element of the building. Additions shall not have a "tacked on" appearance, and either the addition should be consistent with the existing building's design element, or the existing building should be remodeled concurrently with construction of the addition. Ordinance , Exhibit F: Proposed Amended Article 25 Note: underlined and bolded text represents new text; stroke through represents text to be eliminated