My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June 2016 i MRW & Associates, LLC <br />Executive Summary <br />California Assembly Bill 117, passed in 2002, established Community Choice Aggregation in California, for the purpose of providing the opportunity for local governments or special <br />jurisdictions to procure or provide electric power for their residents and businesses. In June <br />2014, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to allocate funding to <br />explore the creation of a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) Program called East Bay <br />Community Energy (EBCE) and directed County staff to undertake the steps necessary to evaluate the feasibility of a CCA. This feasibility study is in response to this Board Action. <br />In order to assess whether a CCA is “feasible” in Alameda County, the local objectives must be <br />laid out and understood. Based on the specifications of the initial request for proposals and input <br />from the County, this study: <br /> Quantifies the electric loads that an Alameda County CCA would have to serve <br /> Estimates the costs to start-up and operate the CCA <br /> Considers scenarios with differing assumptions concerning the amount of carbon-free <br />power being supplied to the CCA so as to assess the costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions possible with the CCA <br /> Includes analysis of in-county renewable generation <br /> Compares the rates that could be offered by the CCA to PG&E’s rates <br /> Quantitatively explores the rate competiveness to key input variables, such as the cost of <br />natural gas <br /> Explores what activities a CCA might take with respect to administering customer-side <br />energy efficiency programs <br /> Calculates the macroeconomic development and employment benefits of CCA formation. <br />Loads and Forecast <br />Figure ES-1 provides a snapshot of Alameda County electric load in 2014 by city and by rate <br />class. As the figure shows, total electricity load in 2014 from Alameda County was <br />approximately 8,000 GWh. The cities of Oakland, Fremont, and Hayward were together <br />responsible for half the county load, with Berkeley, San Leandro, and Pleasanton also contributing substantially. Residential and commercial customers made up the majority of the <br />county load, with smaller contributions from the industrial and public sectors. <br />To forecast CCA loads through 2030, MRW used a 0.3% annual average growth rate, which is <br />consistent with the California Energy Commission’s most recent electricity demand forecast for <br />PG&E’s planning area. This growth rate incorporates load reductions from the CCA’s energy efficiency programs of about 6 GWh per year from 2021 through 2030. Figure ES-2 shows this <br />forecast by class, with the energy efficiency savings that are included in the forecast indicated by <br />the top (yellow) segment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.