My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June 2016 iv MRW & Associates, LLC <br />potential in Alameda County is developed as a result of commitments by the CCA. Additional in-county, small solar projects are assumed to be added at 5-10 MW per year. <br />As a result of feedback from reviews of the preliminary results, an additional case in which we <br />assume that 50% of the renewables are met with local generation. This case is discussed in <br />Chapter 7 and will be explored in greater detail in an addendum. <br />Additional studies are available and underway2 assessing in more detail the solar potential in the County, which preliminarily confirm the assumptions used here are conservative (i.e., low). <br />Once formed and operational, the CCA should investigate in greater detail the practical solar <br />potential in the County. <br />Rate Results <br />Scenario 1 (Simple Renewable Compliance) <br />Figure ES-3 summarizes the results of Scenario 1. The figure shows the total average cost of the Alameda CCA to serve its customers (vertical bars) and the comparable PG&E generation rate <br />(line).3 Of the CCA cost elements, the greatest cost is for non-renewable generation followed by <br />the cost for the renewable generation, which increases over the years according to the RPS <br />standards. Another important CCA customer cost is the Power Charge Indifference Adjustment <br />(PCIA), which is the CPUC-mandated charge that PG&E must impose on all CCA customers. This fee is expected to decrease in most years beginning in 2019 and have less of an impact on <br />the CCA customer rates over time. <br />Under Scenario 1, the differential between PG&E generation rates and average cost for the <br />Alameda CCA to serve its customer (aka the CCA rates) is positive in each year (i.e., CCA rates <br />are lower than PG&E rates). As a result, Alameda CCA customers’ average generation rate (including contributions to the reserve fund) can be set at a level that is lower than PG&E’s <br />average customer generation rate in each year. <br /> <br />2 For example, “Bay Area Smart Energy 2020,” available at <br />http://bayarearegionalcollaborative.org/pdfs/BayAreaSmartEnergy2020fin.pdf 3 All rates are in nominal dollars. Note that these are NOT the full rates shown on PG&E bills. They are only the <br />generation portion of the rates. Other parts of the rate, such as transmission and distribution, are not included, as customers pay the same charges for these components regardless of who is providing their power.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.