My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 9 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />Power Supply Cost Assumptions <br />As discussed above, the CCA would procure a portfolio of resources to meet its customers’ <br />needs, which would consist of a mix of renewable and non-renewable (i.e., wholesale market) <br />resources. As shown in Figure 10, the products to be purchased by the CCA consist generally of <br />energy, capacity and renewable attributes (which for counting purposes take the form of renewable energy credits, or RECs).21 <br />Figure 10. Power Supply Cost Elements <br /> <br /> <br />The CCA will be procuring supplies from the same competitive market for resources as PG&E. <br />As a result, we assume that the costs for renewable and non-renewable energy and for resource adequacy capacity are the same for the CCA as for new purchases made by PG&E (as used in our forecast of PG&E rates discussed below). Wholesale market prices for electricity in <br />California are largely driven by the cost of operating natural gas fueled power plants, since these <br />plants typically have the highest operating costs and are the marginal units. As a result, market <br />prices are a function of the efficiency of the marginal generators, the price of natural gas and the cost of GHG allowances. MRW developed forecasts of these elements to derive a power price forecast for use in determining costs for the CCA and PG&E. Capacity prices are based on prices <br />for resource adequacy contracts reported by the CPUC. <br />MRW developed a forecast of renewable generation prices starting from an assessment of the <br />current market price for renewable power. For the current market price, MRW relied on wind and solar contract prices reported by California municipal utilities and CCAs in 2015 and early 2016, finding an average price of $49/MWh for the solar contracts, $55/MWh for windpower <br /> <br />21 RECs are typically bundled with energy deliveries from renewable energy projects, with each REC representing 1 MWh of renewable energy. A limited number of unbundled RECs may be used to meet RPS requirements. For the <br />purpose of this study we have not considered unbundled RECs and have rather estimated costs based on renewable energy contracts where the RECs are bundled.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.