My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 12 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />deliveries in other hours. When high renewable energy deliveries coincide with low loads, the CCA will need to sell the excess, likely at a loss, or curtail deliveries, and potentially have to <br />make up those renewable energy purchases during higher load hours to comply with the RPS. <br />The result is that the procurement costs will be somewhat higher than simply contracting with <br />sufficient capacity to meet the annual RPS. <br />PG&E Rate and Exit Fee Forecasts <br />MRW developed a forecast of PG&E’s bundled generation rates and CCA exit fees in order to compare the projected rates that customers would pay as Alameda CCA customers to the <br />projected rates and fees they would pay as bundled PG&E customers. <br />PG&E Bundled Generation Rates <br />To ensure a consistent and reliable financial analysis, MRW developed a 30-year forecast of <br />PG&E’s bundled generation rates using market prices for renewable energy purchases, market power purchases, greenhouse gas allowances, and capacity that are consistent with those used in <br />the forecast of Alameda CCA’s supply costs. MRW additionally forecast the cost of PG&E’s <br />existing resource portfolio, adding in market purchases only when necessary to meet projected <br />demand. MRW assumed that near-term changes to PG&E’s generation portfolio would be driven <br />primarily by increases to the Renewable Portfolio Standard requirement in the years leading up to 2030 and by the retirement of the Diablo Canyon nuclear units at the end of their current <br />license periods in 2024 and 2025. More information about this forecast is provided in Appendix <br />B. <br />MRW forecasts that, on average, PG&E’s generation rates will increase just slightly faster than <br />inflation through 2030, with 2030 rates 3% higher than today’s rates when considered on a constant dollar basis (i.e., assuming zero inflation). Underlying this result are three distinct rate <br />periods: <br />1. An initial period of faster rate growth through 2023 (1.3% above inflation); <br />2. A period of rate decline from 2023-2026 (2.5% below inflation) primarily due to the <br />retirement of Diablo Canyon24; and 3. A period of dampened rate growth through 2030 (0.2% above inflation) primarily due to <br />the replacement of high-cost renewable power contracts currently in PG&E’s portfolio <br />with new lower-priced contracts (reflecting the significant fall in renewable power prices <br />in recent years). <br />PG&E’s bundled generation rates in each year of MRW’s forecast are shown in Figure 12, on both a nominal and constant-dollar basis. <br /> <br /> <br />24 More information can be found in the Appendix C
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.