My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 14 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />Pro Forma Elements <br />Figure 13 provides a schematic of the pro forma analysis, outlining the input elements of the <br />analysis and the output results. The analysis involves a comparison between the generation- <br />related costs that would be paid by Alameda CCA customers and the generation-related costs <br />that would be paid by PG&E bundled service customers. Costs paid by CCA customers include all CCA-related costs (i.e., supply portfolio costs, net energy efficiency costs,25 and administrative and general costs) and exit fee payments that CCA customers will be required to <br />make to PG&E. <br />As discussed in previous sections, supply portfolio costs and energy efficiency program costs are <br />informed and affected by CCA loads, by the requirements the CCA will need to meet (or will choose to meet) such as with respect to renewable procurement, and by CCA participation levels, which can vary depending on whether or not all cities in the county choose to join the CCA. <br />Administrative and general costs are discussed further below. <br /> <br />Figure 13. Pro forma Analysis <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />25 We anticipate that Alameda CCA’s energy efficiency costs will be fully offset by Public Benefits Charge revenue <br />provided by PG&E for the purpose of energy efficiency programming and that net costs to Alameda CCA will be zero. <br />Pr <br />o-for <br />m <br />a <br />analys <br />is <br />Inputs: selection of scenarios and cities <br />Load Forecast <br />PG&E Generation Rate Forecast <br />Supply Costs <br />Forecast Adm. Costs <br />Forecast <br />Assessment of CCA viability and CCA customer rates vs, PG&E customer rates <br />(also accounts for reserve fund contributions) <br />Exit fees <br />Forecast <br />Net Energy <br />Efficiency Costs <br />Forecast <br />Generation Rates paid by Alameda CCA Customers (also accounts for debt interest)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.