Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 18 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />Figure 14. Scenario 1 Rate Savings, 2017-2030 <br /> <br /> <br />Residential Bill Impacts <br />Table 5 shows the average annual savings for Residential customers under Scenario 1. The average annual bill for the residential customer on the Alameda CCA program will be on average <br />7% lower than the same bill on PG&E rates. <br /> <br />Table 6. Scenario 1 Savings for Residential CCA Customers <br />Residential  <br />Monthly  <br />Consumption  <br />(kWh)  <br />Bill with PG&E  <br />($)  <br />Bill with  <br />Alameda CCA  <br />($)  <br />Savings ($) Savings (%)  <br />2017 650 147 142 5 3%  <br />2020 650 160 145 15 9%  <br />2030 650 201 188 13 6%  <br /> <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br />Figure 15 shows the GHG emissions from 2017-2030 for Alameda CCA under Scenario 1, and PG&E’s expected emissions for the same load if no CCA is formed. The CCA’s GHG emissions <br />initially increase from 2017 to 2019 as the CCA is phased in across the county (from serving <br />33% potential county load in 2017 to 100% in 2019), and then decrease steadily in the following <br />years as the CCA’s renewable content grows pursuant to SB 350’s requirements of 50% RPS by <br />2030. PG&E emissions are lower than those of the CCA in this scenario due to the diversity in