My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 24 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />GHG Emissions <br />Similar to Scenarios 1 and 2, under Scenario 3, the Alameda CCA’s GHG emissions first <br />increase from 2017 to 2019 as the CCA is phased in into the entire county. However, in Scenario <br />3 this increase is partially off-set by the increasing renewable content in the CCA’s supply mix. <br />Thus the CCA’s emissions in this scenario grow at a slower rate from 2017 to 2019 than in the first 2 scenarios, then decrease till 80% renewable supply is achieved in 2021, and remain flat thereafter. The CCA’s GHG emissions under this scenario are lower than PG&E’s expected <br />emissions for the same load if no CCA is formed. Figure 20 shows the expected GHG emissions <br />from the CCA and PG&E for all years from 2017 to 2030. <br /> <br />Figure 20. Scenario 3 GHG Emissions by Year Year (“Normal” PG&E Hydro Conditions) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.