My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 26 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />Table 9. Diablo Canyon Relicensing Sensitivity Results, 2017-2030 <br /> <br />Average PG&E <br />Rate (¢/kWh) <br />Average Rate <br />Differential (¢/kWh) <br />Base Case 10.36 2.1 <br />Diablo Canyon Relicensing 11.75 3.4 <br /> <br />Higher Renewable Power Prices Sensitivity <br />This sensitivity case evaluates the impact of higher prices for renewable power on the CCA’s <br />financial viability. As discussed in Appendix B, in the base case, renewable power prices are flat <br />in nominal dollars through 2022, based on the assumption that projected declines in renewable <br />development costs will offset increases associated with the planned expiration of federal <br />renewable tax credits.35,36 In the Higher Renewable Power Prices sensitivity, we assume that renewable prices would be flat in nominal dollars through 2022 if it were not for the tax credit expirations and add the impact of the tax credit expirations to the base case prices. Average <br />renewable power prices in this scenario are 0-10% higher than in the base case scenario through <br />2021, about 20% higher in 2021 and 2022, and 30% higher after 2022 when the solar investment <br />tax credit is reduced to 10%. These higher prices affect both the CCA and PG&E, but they have a greater effect on the CCA because PG&E has significant amounts of renewable resources under long-term contract. The impact of this stress case is to reduce the 2017-2030 average rate <br />differential by 0.3¢/kWh relative to the base case. <br /> <br />Table 10. Higher Renewable Power Prices Sensitivity Results, 2017-2030 <br /> <br />Average Renewable <br />Power Prices <br />(¢/kWh)37 <br />Average Rate <br />Differential <br />(¢/kWh) <br />Base Case 5.4 2.1 <br />Higher Renewable Power Prices 6.6 1.8 <br /> <br /> <br />35 Investment Tax Credit (ITC) which is commonly used by solar developers, is scheduled to remain at its current <br />level of 30% through 2019 and then to fall over three years to 10%, where it is to remain. The federal Production Tax Credit (PTC), which is commonly used by wind developers, is scheduled to be reduced for facilities <br />commencing construction in 2017-2019 and eliminated for subsequent construction. U.S. Department of Energy. Business Energy Investment Tax Credit (ITC). http://energy.gov/savings/business- <br />energy-investment-tax-credit-itc; U.S. Department of Energy. Electricity Production Tax Credit (PTC). http://energy.gov/savings/renewable-electricity-production-tax-credit-ptc <br />36 The base case forecast would also be consistent with a scenario in which the tax credit expirations are delayed. 37 Average for solar and wind utility scale generation (>3MW), not including local Alameda County generation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.