Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 29 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />Table 14. Stress Test Results, 2017-2030 <br />  <br />Average Rate  <br />Differential  <br />(¢/kWh)  <br />Base 2.1  <br />Stress Scenario ‐0.7  <br /> <br />Figure 21 shows the difference between the PG&E customer rate and the Alameda CCA <br />customer rate (including exit fees) in the base case and in each of the sensitivity scenarios, for each year from 2017 to 2030. As Figure 21 illustrates, CCA customer rates are lower than PG&E <br />customer rates in each of the individual sensitivity cases in each year and are lower that PG&E <br />customer rates in the stress test case from 2017-2023. Beginning in 2024, CCA customer rates <br />exceed PG&E customer rates in the stress test case (i.e., the rate differential is negative) due to <br />the reduction in PG&E rates as Diablo Canyon is retired and replaced with lower-cost power sources. <br /> <br />Figure 21. Difference Between PG&E Customer Rates and CCA Customer Rates Under <br />Each Sensitivity Case, 2017-2030 <br /> <br />