My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10A Action Items 2016 1121
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1121
>
10A Action Items 2016 1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2016 5:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2016 5:08:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
11/21/2016
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2016-160
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 37 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />County Job impact by Stage of Job generation, Scenario 1 <br />Job changes typically start from a direct productive event that alters the need for labor, such as <br />constructing a facility or opening/closing a business. Then there are the local cycles of business- <br />to-business supplier transactions that follow (called indirect jobs), cycles of household spending <br />from the direct and indirect paychecks (called induced jobs), and sometimes there are job changes due to changes in costs (rates) of a location which affect doing-business in the county. These are job impacts from competitiveness effects. The indirect and induced combined are <br />referred to as multiplier effects. The total job impact reflects the direct, the multiplier, and the <br />competitiveness effects. Figure 25 juxtaposes the county’s direct job impacts with the total job <br />impacts from Scenario 1. The majority of job creation in the scenario is from non-direct economic influences - specifically from the net rate savings which drives approximately 76 percent of the county’s job gain (Figure 26). As shown in Appendix E, Scenario 2 would have <br />an identical profile of direct jobs but a slightly lower total job profile, due to almost $60 million <br />of curtailed net rate savings (relative to scenario 1) through 2030. Scenario 3 has a slightly <br />higher direct job profile but a greatly reduced total job impact profile. <br /> <br />Figure 25. CCA Scenario 1 County Job Impacts <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.