Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br />June, 2016 50 MRW & Associates, LLC <br />long as two medium-sized cities or one larger city joins the CCA, this “minimum” load will be met. It is not a true minimum, however, because the true minimum depends on the make-up of <br />the customer portfolio. <br />Figure 30. Potential load (85% participation) per city <br /> <br /> <br />Table 26. Examples of Combinations of Cities and the Average Generation Rate <br />Examples of city combinations  <br />ONLY BERKELEY ONLY PLEASANTON ONLY DUBLIN +  <br />NEWARK  <br />TOTAL  <br />ALAMEDA  <br />COUNTY  <br />Potential  <br />Load  <br />(MWh)  <br />Customer  <br />Class (%)  <br />Potential  <br />Load  <br />(MWh)  <br />Customer  <br />Class (%)  <br />Potential  <br />Load  <br />(MWh)  <br />Customer  <br />Class (%)  <br />Customer  <br />Class (%)  <br />Residential 136,000 23.37% 158,000 35.11% 160,000 33.83% 32.90%  <br />Commercial 176,000 30.24% 232,000 51.56% 234,000 49.47% 43.70%  <br />Industrial 74,000 12.71% 36,000 8.00% 41,000 8.67% 13.80%  <br />Public 193,000 33.16% 19,000 4.22% 35,000 7.40% 8.60%  <br />Street lights + Pumping 3,000 0.52% 5,000 1.11% 3,000 0.63% 1.00%  <br />TOTAL 582,000   450,000   473,000      <br />Average PG&E rate (¢/kWh)   9.71   10.56   10.51 10.36  <br />Average Alameda rate (¢/kWh)   9.92   10.48   10.19 8.28  <br />Differential rate (¢/kWh)   ‐0.21   0.08   0.32 2.08  <br />