My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
4A Public Hearings 2016 1219
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2016
>
Packet 2016 1219
>
4A Public Hearings 2016 1219
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2016 3:00:38 PM
Creation date
12/13/2016 3:00:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
12/19/2016
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
1 <br />LAW OFFICES OF <br />A. ALAN BERGER <br />95 South Market Street <br />Suite 545 <br />San Jose, CA 95113 <br />Telephone: 408-536-0500 <br />Facsimile: 408-536-0504 <br /> <br /> <br />November 4, 2016 <br /> <br />City Council of San Leandro <br />c/o Elmer Penaranda, Senior Planner <br />City of San Leandro <br />835 E. 14th Street <br />San Leandro, CA 94577 <br /> <br />Via Email and Hand Delivery <br /> <br />Re: File item 16-556; Heron Bay HOA kiosk proposal <br /> <br />Dear Honorable Council Members: <br /> <br />As you may be aware, I am the attorney for the Heron Bay Homeowners <br />Association (hereinafter referred to as “the HOA” or “the association”). The purpose of <br />this correspondence is to comment on and to disagree in part with the approval of the <br />Permit Application of Heron Bay Homeowners Association for the installation of a kiosk <br />by the City Planning Commission, which was granted on October 20, 2016. With the <br />agreement of and advise of Senior Planner Elmer Penaranda, Heron Bay did not appeal <br />the decision of the Planning Commission as the HOA agrees with and appreciates the <br />Commission’s approval of the kiosk in general, but wishes to ask the City Council to <br />modify two of the conditions for permit approval stated by the Commission. <br /> <br />The association accepts and is grateful for the decision of the Planning <br />Commission. The association, however, disagrees with three conditions precedent <br />imposed by the Commission on the granting of this approval. As the approval was <br />advisory only, subject to the vote of the City Council, the association respectfully asks <br />the City Council to grant the permit application for the installation of the kiosk with the <br />following modifications from the recommendation of the Commission. <br /> <br />The HOA actually disagreed with three points made by the Planning Commission. <br />Those three areas are as follows: <br /> <br /> 1. The HOA would prefer to have Anchorage closed to ingress traffic with all of <br />the provisions stated in the permit application and as recommended for approval by the <br />City staff. However, the HOA will accept the decision of the Planning Commission to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.