My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings 2017 0206
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2017
>
Packet 2017 0206
>
5A Public Hearings 2017 0206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2017 6:52:08 PM
Creation date
1/31/2017 6:52:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
2/6/2017
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2017-009
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
File Number: 16-662 <br />and now to the City Council, and in connection with the analysis in this staff report. <br />Existing State law regarding electric fences (California Civil Code 835) identifies that an owner <br />of real property shall not install and operate an electric fence where a local ordinance prohibits <br />that installation and operation. If a local ordinance allows the installation and operation of an <br />electric fence, the installation and operation of electric fences must meet the requirements of <br />the local ordinance, as well as any requirements listed under State law. State law does not <br />supersede the City’s authority to prohibit or regulate electric fences. <br />There are no known existing electric fences within San Leandro. Staff was unable to find any <br />record of a building permit issued for an electric fence. The use of electric fences in urban <br />areas is uncommon and, according to the Alameda County Fire Department, currently no <br />other cities under its jurisdiction allow their use and installation. <br />It is staff’s position that electric fences pose a number of challenges and concerns with regard <br />to their placement, safety and appearance. For example, the Appellant’s proposed building <br />permit was to construct an electric fence around a warehouse and trucking terminal that is <br />immediately adjacent to a property that has a pediatric clinic and social services facility <br />catering to seniors. This creates a high probability that persons in the proximity to the electric <br />fence may be inadvertently exposed to an electrical current, especially during wet or rainy <br />conditions. In short, it is staff’s assertion that installing any type of electric fence near these <br />types of facilities where exposure to more sensitive users is inappropriate especially when <br />safer, attractive and effective fencing and security alternatives exist. <br />Staff’s position is that there are a number of equally effective and less dangerous alternatives <br />to the use of electric fences that are currently allowed, such as invisible laser tripwire fences <br />and motion sensing cameras. Other types of fencing materials with aesthetic and safety <br />concerns are permitted, but they have strict limitations under the Zoning Code. Under Article <br />16, Section 4-1678 of the Zoning Code, razor and barbed wire fences are only permitted in <br />the CS, IL, and IG zoning districts and are expressly prohibited in all other zoning districts. <br />The Zoning Code further prohibits them from being located within 300 feet of a public street <br />frontage and from being visible from a public street. Through the development review process, <br />Planning staff actively discourages the use of razor wire, barbed wire, and cyclone/chain link <br />fencing materials, encouraging applicants to instead use more aesthetically pleasing <br />decorative metal fencing that compliments industrial buildings and landscaping. Electric <br />fences have a distinctive appearance, are highly visible, and typically include warning signs <br />placed at regular intervals to alert passersby of their voltage and potential shock features. <br />Such features are incompatible with the City’s design policies. <br />There are currently no codified provisions at the local or state level that specifically address <br />emergency access in relation to electric fences. In its review of the appeal, the Alameda <br />County Fire Department informed staff that there are currently no Fire Code or similar code <br />provisions in place requiring emergency access or shut-off devices for properties secured by <br />an electric fence. Without such regulations, the Fire Department would be required to <br />condition each permit on a case-by-case basis. Without such regulations, emergency <br />responders may have delayed access, which could cause life safety and preservation of <br />property issues when responding to land uses and properties with electric fences. <br />Page 3 City of San Leandro Printed on 1/31/2017 <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.