My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2017-009
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2017
>
Reso 2017-009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2017 2:01:06 PM
Creation date
2/15/2017 10:54:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
2/6/2017
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
___CCAgenda 2017 0206 CS + RG
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2017\Packet 2017 0206
5A Public Hearings 2017 0206
(Approved)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2017\Packet 2017 0206
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Public Resources Code <br />§21000, et seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter <br />3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively, "CEQA"), the Board of Zoning <br />Adjustments decision does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of Public <br />Resources Code Section 21065, 14 Cal Code Regs. Section 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3), or <br />15378 because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the <br />environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. <br />Even if such activities did constitute a project under CEQA, staff believes the activities fall <br />within the "common sense" exemption set forth in 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b)(3), <br />excluding projects where "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the <br />activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment..." <br />E. The City Council finds that electric fences are substantially different from other types of <br />fences and fencing materials which are permitted and regulated under the Zoning Code, <br />such as tubular steel, razor or barbed wire fences, in that electric fences require an electric <br />current and are designed differently than other types of fences, consisting of horizontal <br />electrified wires which have a function and appearance that is substantially different from <br />other types of fences. Electric fences are not visually transparent and may be accompanied <br />by warning signs and/or a second non -electrified fence. For these reasons, electric fences <br />are aesthetically and functionally incompatible with the design and land use policies <br />identified in the General Plan and the quality of fence design prevalent in the City. <br />F. The foregoing determination that electric fences are not permitted under the Zoning Code <br />is consistent with the express language and intent of the Zoning Code, and is consistent <br />with the purpose of zoning districts and the General Plan because the determination <br />promotes the general health, safety and welfare of the residents and preserves the character <br />of neighborhoods in the City of San Leandro. Pursuant to the principles of permissive <br />zoning, the use of electric fences is not a permitted use or activity of or upon land within <br />the City of San Leandro, such that it is prohibited under the City's Zoning Code. <br />Introduced by Councilmember Cox, seconded by Councilmember Ballew, passed and adopted this <br />6t' day of February 2017, by the following vote: <br />Members of the Council: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Ballew, Cox, Hernandez, Lee, Lopez, Thomas; (7) <br />Mayor Cutter <br />NOES: None (0) <br />ABSENT: None (0) <br />ATTEST: <br />Tamika Greenwood, City Clerk <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2017-009 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.