My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2A Work Session 2017 0313
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2017
>
Packet 2017 0313
>
2A Work Session 2017 0313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2017 3:16:54 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 3:16:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
3/13/2017
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Public Outreach 2 <br />2-15 <br />about many of the potential benefits that the trail had to offer – including <br />transportation, recreation, as well as opportunities to create economic benefit <br />and beautify the community. At the same time, they remarked that there are <br />currently numerous trespassers along the creek area and there are significant <br />public safety concerns there. People indicated that it would be extremely <br />important to address these concerns if a trail were to be implemented in this <br />area. <br />The portion of the proposed trail further to the east (Segments 5 to 8) is very <br />different in character and the project generated very different types of <br />comments. Initially, a large number of comments were received reflecting <br />concerns that the trail might be developed on their property, as many of <br />the property lines extend to or near the center of the Creek. As a result, <br />the comments focused on potential impacts to their privacy and concerns <br />about trespassing and crime. Once it became clear that the proposed routes <br />along these segments would largely consist of on-street facilities, the types of <br />comments focused more on which streets might provide the most desirable <br />connections and could best accommodate trail users. <br />35
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.