Laserfiche WebLink
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT <br />This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into in <br />Alameda County, California, as of July 11, 2017, by and between THE MARINA INN (the <br />"Ind'), on the one hand, and the CITY OF SAN LEANDRO ("City") and the CITY COUNCIL <br />OF THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO ("Council'), on the other hand (collectively, the "Parties"), <br />with reference to and based upon the following: <br />RECITALS <br />A. The Inn operates and maintains the property at 68 Monarch Drive, San Leandro, <br />California (the "Marina Inn Property"), pursuant to a ground lease entered into between the City <br />and the Inn approved by the City of San Leandro City Council April 2, 1984, and executed April <br />5, 1984 (the "Lease"). <br />B. The Inn is a member of the Coalition for the San Leandro Shoreline, an <br />unincorporated association. <br />C. On or about July 20, 2015, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2015.125 (the <br />"Resolution") certifying an Environmental Impact Report (the `BIR"), adopting mitigation <br />findings, findings concerning alternatives, a statement of overriding considerations and a <br />mitigation monitoring program under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for <br />the specific activities and approvals that collectively constitute the "San Leandro Shoreline <br />Development Project" described in Chapter 3 ["Project Description'] of the EIR (the "Project"). <br />D. On or about August 18, 2015, Coalition for the San Leandro Shoreline filed a <br />Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate ("Petition") against the City entitled Coalition for the San <br />Leandro Shoreline, an unincorporated association, v. City of San Leandro, City Council of San <br />Leandro and Does I through 10, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG 15782404 (the <br />"Action'), in which it alleged that the City had violated CEQA by its actions in approving the <br />Resolution. <br />E. On or about June 8, 2016, the City filed an Answer to the Petition in the Action, <br />in which the City denied all of the material allegations in the Petition and asserted affirmative <br />defenses. <br />F. The parties have reached a settlement to resolve all issues relating to the Action, <br />the Resolution, and the Project (collectively, the "Dispute"), in accordance with the terms of this <br />Agreement. This Agreement resolves all issues relating to the Dispute. <br />AGREEMENT <br />WHEREFORE, for valuable consideration, including the obligation and terms as set forth <br />below, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: <br />