Laserfiche WebLink
Table 9 Specific Plan Area Soil Parameters................................................................................. 152 <br />Table 10 Specific Plan Greenhouse Gas Emissions ....................................................................... 178 <br />Table 11 Specific Plan Consistency with Applicable San Leandro Climate Action Plan Goals ...... 180 <br />Table 12 Specific Plan Consistency with Plan Bay Area 2040 ....................................................... 181 <br />Table 13 Cleanup Sites in the Specific Plan Area .......................................................................... 185 <br />Table 14 Policy Consistency with San Leandro 2035 General Plan .............................................. 228 <br />Table 15 Noise Measurement Results .......................................................................................... 244 <br />Table 16 Vibration-Related Building Damage Thresholds ............................................................ 250 <br />Table 17 Significance of Changes in Operational Roadway Noise Exposure ................................ 251 <br />Table 18 Maximum Estimated Noise Levels from Construction Equipment ................................ 254 <br />Table 19 Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment at Noise-Sensitive Receptors ................. 256 <br />Table 20 Cumulative Contribution to Daily Area Roadway Traffic Levels in Future Year 2035 .... 258 <br />Table 21 Current Housing and Population in San Leandro and Alameda County ........................ 261 <br />Table 22 2035 General Plan Population, Housing, and Jobs Projections ..................................... 262 <br />Table 23 ABAG Housing and Employment Projections ................................................................. 262 <br />Table 24 Employee Generation Assumptions ............................................................................... 265 <br />Table 25 Specific Plan Growth Comparison .................................................................................. 265 <br />Table 26 Current (2017) Enrollment and Capacities of Bay Fair Area Attended Districts <br /> and Schools .................................................................................................................... 275 <br />Table 27 Level of Service Definition for Intersections .................................................................. 300 <br />Table 28 Existing Intersection Level of Service ............................................................................. 301 <br />Table 29 Arterial Segment Level of Service – Existing Conditions ................................................ 302 <br />Table 30 Level of Service Definitions for Freeway Mainline Segments ........................................ 303 <br />Table 31 Freeway Level of Service – Existing Conditions ............................................................. 304 <br />Table 32 Existing AC Transit Weekday Service ............................................................................. 306 <br />Table 33 Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities ........................................................................... 309 <br />Table 34 Study Intersection LOS Standards .................................................................................. 318 <br />Table 35 Intersection Level of Service for Cumulative Conditions, without and with <br /> Proposed Specific Plan ................................................................................................... 327 <br />Table 36 VMT Per Capita – Existing and Projected ....................................................................... 328 <br />Table 37 MTS Freeway LOS Results for 2040 ............................................................................... 331 <br />Table 38 MTS Arterial LOS, 2040 Cumulative Conditions, without and with Proposed Specific Plan332 <br />Table 39 Proposed Specific Plan Trips on BART ............................................................................ 336 <br />Table 40 City-Service Landfill Capacity ......................................................................................... 344 <br />59