My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings 2018 0220
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
Packet 2018 0220
>
5A Public Hearings 2018 0220
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2018 1:44:49 PM
Creation date
2/14/2018 1:44:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
2/20/2018
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2018-008
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1018
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
2.3.5 Infrastructure and Services <br />Chapter 6 of the proposed Specific Plan discusses existing infrastructure and includes policies to <br />promote reclaimed water projects, solar power generation, solar heating, efficient recycling, storm <br />water pollution prevention and infiltration and other environmentally sensitive and carbon footprint <br />minimizing infrastructure in the Specific Plan Area. <br />2.3.6 Implementation <br />Specific Plan Chapter 7 describes the implementation activities, capital improvement projects, <br />monitoring approach, and plan administration needed to execute the vision of the Specific Plan. It <br />identifies a range of funding programs to implement the capital improvements needed to support <br />existing and future development. The chapter includes the process for administering and evaluating <br />the Specific Plan over time, the phasing and development strategy, implementation actions, capital <br />improvement costs, and funding and financing options. <br />2.3.7 Buildout Projections <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2 requires that an EIR focus on the significant “direct and indirect” <br />and “short-term and long-term” effects of a project. To ensure a conservative approach in analyzing <br />environmental effects under CEQA, EIRs typically analyze what could be considered a maximum <br />reasonable impact scenario in order to capture as many significant environmental effects as could <br />reasonably be expected as a result of the project. For a programmatic evaluation of a land use plan, <br />this entails projecting buildout calculations to carry through the environmental review process. <br />These projections reflect the estimated number of new housing units, amount of new commercial <br />development, and increased resident and employment populations that are reasonably foreseeable <br />for the duration of the proposed Specific Plan through 2035. The actual rate and amount of <br />development would be dependent on market conditions and regulatory processes. <br />For the purposes of the environmental analysis, a reasonable and conservative estimate of buildout <br />associated with the proposed Specific Plan through the horizon year 2035 would include <br />development of 2,540 housing units and 300,000 square feet of office space, as well as the removal <br />of an estimated 161,000 square feet of retail space. <br />The projections rely on three primary factors: <br /> Market Conditions in the Specific Plan Area. The market analysis completed by Strategic <br />Economics as part of the project’s existing conditions report, and further feasibility analysis <br />completed by the project team on February 7, 2017, found that the market for development in <br />the Bay Fair area is challenging. Development will be challenging in the Bay Fair area in the <br />short-term, but may occur as the market changes in the medium-to-long term. Currently, <br />residential is a more market-supported development type than office. This analysis suggests <br />that full buildout of the Bay Fair area to its theoretical maximum intensity is unlikely in the time <br />horizon of this plan, and that the development that does occur may not be immediate. <br /> The Availability of Possible Development Sites. The project team identified the areas in the <br />Specific Plan Area where it seemed possible that development could occur in the time horizon <br />of the Specific Plan. These areas where development seemed possible were: BART Station Area, <br />portions of Bayfair Center, Fashion Faire shopping area, portions of the Fairmont Square <br />shopping center area, and the King Parcel. Only minimal development was assumed along <br />113
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.