Laserfiche WebLink
CiTY OF SAN LEANDRO BiCYCLE & PEDESTRiAN MASTER PLAN ~ v <br />Contents <br />Executive Summary ..................................................1 <br />Chapter 1: introduction...............................................8 <br />Chapter 2: Goals & Policies...........................................33 <br />Chapter 3: Bicycle Network ..........................................40 <br />Chapter 4: Pedestrian Network .....................................100 <br />Chapter 5: Safety, Education, and Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .136 <br />Chapter 6: implementation .........................................158 <br />Appendix A: Existing Policy Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .192 <br />Appendix B: Project Prioritization Worksheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .198 <br />Appendix C: ATP Compliance Table .................................202 <br />Appendix D: Funding Sources ......................................204 <br />Appendix E: Crosswalk Prioritization & Scoring Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .212 <br />Appendix F: Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Update Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .214 <br />Appendix G: Safe Routes to School improvement Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 <br />Appendix H: California Streets & Highways Code Compliance . . . . . . . . . . .242 <br />List of Tables <br />Table 1: Existing and Proposed Bikeway Length by Class . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 <br />Table 2: High Priority Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 <br />Table 3: Collisions Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31 <br />Table 4: 2010 Bikeway Network ......................................42 <br />Table 5: 2018 Existing Bicycle Network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44 <br />Table 6: Journey to Work Mode Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59 <br />Table 7: Existing & Proposed Bikeway Length by Class. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .69 <br />Table 8: Recommended Class i Bikeways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70 <br />Table 9: Recommended Class ii Bikeways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72 <br />Table 10: Recommended Class ii Buffered Bikeways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72 <br />Table 11: Recommended Class iii Bikeways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74 <br />Table 12: Recommended Class iii Bicycle Boulevards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .75 <br />Table 13: Recommended Class iv Bikeways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78 <br />Table 14: Recommended Study Corridors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 <br />Table 15: Recommended Bikeways ....................................91 <br />Table 16: Key Pedestrian Policy Action items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115 <br />Table 17: Bikeway Projects with Costs & Priority Score . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .161 <br />Table 18: Prioritized Recommended Bikeway Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .165 <br />Table 19: Pedestrian Projects Costs & Priority Score . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .169 <br />Table 20: Prioritized Recommended Pedestrian Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .174 <br />Table 21: High Priority Bicycle & Pedestrian Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .181 <br />Table 22: Cost Estimates for Bikeway Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 <br />Table 23: Unit Cost Estimates for Bikeway Network. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 <br />Table of Contents and List of Tables & Figures <br />135