Laserfiche WebLink
<br />27 <br /> <br />Project Area Agreement with County <br /> <br />The Project Area tax increment is subject to a revenue-sharing agreement (herein and in <br />the Indenture, as amended to date, the “Project Area Agreement”) dated as of July 1, 1993 <br />between the Agency and the County. The Project Area Agreement sets out a formula used to <br />determine the proportional expenditure of funds between the unincorporated County portion of <br />the Project Area and the Successor Agency portion of the Project Area. Under the formula, <br />expenditures in the County portion of the Project Area equaled 38% of net increment (after <br />deducting the former 20% housing set-aside, the 33676 2% payments, the County’s property <br />tax administration fee, Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (“ERAF”) payments and <br />payments made under the Pass-Through Agreements, which are described below) through <br />fiscal year 1998-99; 45% of net increment from fiscal year 1999-00 through fiscal year 2003-04; <br />60% of net increment from fiscal year 2004-05 through fiscal year 2008-09; and 50% of net <br />increment from fiscal year 2009-10 through the remaining life of the Project Area. The Project <br />Area Agreement is distinct from the fiscal agreement between the Successor Agency and the <br />County, described below under “–Pass Through Agreements-County Fiscal Agreement”, which <br />governs pass-through payments to the County and its related entities from all Project Area tax <br />increment. <br /> <br />The Project Area Agreement was amended on July 1, 2001, designating the Alameda <br />County Redevelopment Agency as the redevelopment authority with jurisdiction over the County <br />portion of the Project Area and the Former Agency as the redevelopment authority with <br />jurisdiction over the incorporated portion of the Project Area. The amended Project Area <br />Agreement retained the formula used in the original agreement but directed the Successor <br />Agency to pay to the County the portion of tax increment revenue designated for expenditure in <br />the County portion of the Project Area; the Successor Agency retains the portion designated for <br />expenditure in the incorporated portion of the Project Area. As noted above, beginning in fiscal <br />year 2009-10, the Successor Agency receives 50% of net increment and will continue to receive <br />50% of net increment through the term of the 2018 Bonds. <br /> <br />The Project Area Agreement was further amended, effective as of July 1, 2001, to <br />specify that, because the Hayward Area Recreation and Parks District (“HARD”) is entirely <br />within the unincorporated portion of the Project Area, payments owed to HARD pursuant to the <br />fiscal agreement between the Successor Agency and HARD would be made out of the County’s <br />share of Project Area tax increment. See “–Pass-Through Agreements – Hayward Area <br />Recreation and Parks District (“HARD”) Fiscal Agreement” for additional details on this fiscal <br />agreement and Table 6 for the impact of the allocation of tax increment in this manner. <br /> <br />No Statutory Pass-Through (AB 1290) Payments <br /> <br />As a project area formed prior to January 1, 1994, the Project Area is not subject to the <br />statutory pass-through payments required for project areas formed after that date, which are <br />commonly referred to as “AB 1290” payments. <br /> <br />Section 33676 (2%) Payments <br /> <br />Taxing entities are able to separately receive their share of the growth in valuation due <br />to inflation, known as Section 33676 payments or the 2% payments, pursuant to Section 33676 <br />of the Redevelopment Law. Section 33676 payments are distributed by the County Auditor- <br />Controller to 8 taxing entities: the County, the Chabot-Las Positas Community College District, <br />132