Laserfiche WebLink
<br />31 <br />taxes to reflect the portion of the tax year remaining as determined by the date of the change in <br />ownership or completion of new construction. Supplemental Assessments become a lien <br />against real property. Prior to the enactment of this law, the assessment of such changes was <br />permitted only as of the next tax lien date following the change, and this delayed the realization <br />of increased property taxes from the new assessments for up to 14 months. Since fiscal year <br />1984-85, revenues derived from Supplemental Assessments have been allocated to <br />redevelopment agencies and taxing entities in the same manner as the general property tax. <br />The receipt of Supplemental Assessment revenues by taxing entities typically follows the <br />change of ownership by a year or more. This statute provides increased revenue to the <br />Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund to the extent that supplemental assessments of new <br />construction or changes of ownership occur within the boundaries of redevelopment projects <br />subsequent to the January 1 lien date. To the extent such supplemental assessments occur <br />within the Project Area, tax increment may increase. <br /> <br />The County Auditor-Controller reports that that Successor Agency received <br />approximately $492,000 in supplemental revenues in Fiscal Year 2016-17. Revenues resulting <br />from Supplemental Assessments have not been included in the Fiscal Consultant’s projections <br />of tax increment available to pay debt service on the 2018 Bonds. <br /> <br />Property Tax Administrative Costs. In 1990, the Legislature enacted SB 2557 <br />(Chapter 466, Statutes of 1990) which allows counties to charge for the cost of assessing, <br />collecting and allocating property tax revenues to local government jurisdictions in proportion to <br />the tax-derived revenues allocated to each. SB 1559 (Chapter 697, Statutes of 1992) explicitly <br />includes redevelopment agencies among the jurisdictions which are subject to such charges. <br />The portions of the reimbursement amount that are allocated to each taxing entity within the <br />County are based on the percentage of the total assessed value in the County that each taxing <br />entity’s assessed value represents. <br /> <br />In addition, Sections 34182(e) and 34183(a) of the Dissolution Act allow administrative <br />costs of the County Auditor-Controller for the cost of administering the provisions of the <br />Dissolution Act to be deducted from tax increment revenues before monies are deposited into <br />the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund. <br /> <br />The combined property tax and AB x1 26 administration fees are estimated to amount to <br />approximately $168,000 in fiscal year 2017-18, or approximately 0.98% of the tax increment <br />revenue from the Project Area. <br /> <br />Delinquencies; Teeter Plan <br /> <br />The County has adopted the Alternative Method of Distribution of Tax Levies and <br />Collections and of Tax Sale Proceeds (the “Teeter Plan”). Consequently, secured property tax <br />revenues in the Project Area do not reflect actual collections because the County allocates <br />secured property tax revenues to the Successor Agency as if 100% of the calculated property <br />taxes were collected without adjustment for delinquencies, redemption payments or roll <br />adjustments. The County could elect to terminate this policy and, in such event, the amount of <br />the levy of property tax revenue that could be allocated to the Successor Agency would depend <br />upon the actual collections of the secured taxes within the Project Area. The overall <br />delinquency rate for all secured properties in the Project Area for the most recently completed <br />year of tax payments (fiscal year 2016-17) was 1.4% as of November 22, 2017. <br /> <br />136