My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
4A Presentations 2018 0507
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
Packet 2018 0507
>
4A Presentations 2018 0507
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2018 12:49:42 PM
Creation date
5/2/2018 12:49:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
5/7/2018
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> <br />Projects <br /> <br />The Capital Improvement Program is the mechanism for identifying, defining, tracking, <br />and ranking infrastructure needs. Needs are described as projects and are both for <br />maintenance of existing facilities and construction of new facilities. Projects generally <br />involve construction, are over $50,000, and exclude routine operation and repair that is <br />funded by department operation and maintenance budgets. Funding for projects is <br />established by the City budget. <br /> <br />City management staff and the City Council receive solicitations for project ideas <br />throughout the year and can submit project ideas directly to the City Engineer. Non- <br />management City staff can submit project ideas through their department head and the <br />public can submit project ideas by completing a form available at City events and through <br />the City’s website. Suggested projects are reviewed with the department that will operate <br />the subject facility and must be accepted or sponsored by the department head in order to <br />be considered further. <br /> <br />Prior to preparation of this document the condition of current infrastructure was <br />investigated and projects needed to maintain the infrastructure were created. <br />Additionally, each City Department was asked to forecast infrastructure needed to <br />maintain current service levels under projected population growth as well as to respond to <br />any new services needed by the community; projects identified through this exercise were <br />created. <br /> <br />As a result of the efforts above, the City has a substantial list of projects, the total value <br />of which is more than the funding available for construction of projects. When the cost <br />of all submitted projects exceeds the available funding the benefit of each project must <br />compared and the projects must be prioritized. The prioritization process hinges upon the <br />comparison of benefits or value for each alternative use of the money. The City of San <br />Leandro uses 8 categories to help judge project value. <br /> <br />1. Fiscal Impact <br />2. Economic Development Impact <br />3. Liability, Risk, Public Health, and Safety <br />4. Protection of Existing Facilities and Lifespan <br />5. Quality of Life <br />6. Population Served <br />7. External of Internal Mandate <br />8. One Time Funding Leverage <br /> <br />Each project is scored from low (zero) to high (three) in each category. A matrix of <br />project descriptions for each possible score in each category is in appendix 1. These <br />categories have been selected and defined with consideration for the established City <br />Council goals and the values of the San Leandro community. Project information <br />including a summary, description, justification, impact of not doing the project, and <br />rough order of magnitude cost are provided for review when projects are scored. The <br />23
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.